From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-177.mta1.migadu.com (out-177.mta1.migadu.com [95.215.58.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 265C44119EA for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2026 16:09:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.177 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785341350; cv=none; b=B8LGadl2iQeGURStkJVqtPiaomMIw7BePZuScjVWpWlkgFPEDtkGnpouu6ZvYFrfWgK8bg0cLuPVcw3Euc72hWjERURS6VNK9A4Dkhu1ZEiuMZx46WLjLCPh0RNAIHO+iGb8Tm1BrmVKQshOyJqtAu/FZtHpeONJJb8w552LJd8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785341350; c=relaxed/simple; bh=OJNpt+XFKz2F/s/xnxUXEHTelo8cISHJOL9dL4VTY2k=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=JrDd6y6rldYxPIZcooNZNsqGofVFVJvHK5GWbZnc3V/MWzctos+kPE4Bv45Zt4x6vdmLpbVUT/ddxVmtBdyRqit60tQuJyOdktqf5NNvnBre7cOFFCaHAK8p++kdQUsI60ykK0mpTjdbPIUBVcnT+BT/1pZEMV5ZEzqbVqc4hIE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=wyuan.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=wyuan.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=wyuan.org header.i=@wyuan.org header.b=izHltBI8; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.177 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=wyuan.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=wyuan.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=wyuan.org header.i=@wyuan.org header.b="izHltBI8" Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2026 00:08:35 +0800 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=wyuan.org; s=key1; t=1785341339; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=gHJ/CYE5s4aW0Crg/l1eVr6mAI0ZFCoWVcYGZfSY1so=; b=izHltBI8K6ouHf2CzQI2GwdzhqHZHMf1LapwNgAfMOFAfGMwZexRZF+P+FF3zG5WU+qC7M YKdRcBVThDsbyYH0SomvVi7GVmmfknwySF/NR9hMEAr0CnWK/rpAGO8If3n6y8Zbij2SI0 IoTsXeGfBeV4awYikFh8ruXXZDOj5sDzU0obEjUpo7VyD0G/yGWXKP3dMbreVLoOvP67gF A+bysSDI4IkZTMD0vktJH08EebWZuTaT3Mac4/B/bg1sPElgBrpuBfjnmq5zGeo2eYhhIz I+EDgOXw7x/T8J1sx8MVrw4mWSGCLSUT3dHBzccY5PE7fa6ZoZFHCT3uliL43w== X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Weijie Yuan To: Chen-Yu Yeh Cc: Jonathan Corbet , Alex Shi , Dongliang Mu , Yanteng Si , Hu Haowen <2023002089@link.tyut.edu.cn>, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/16] docs/zh_TW: process: localize terminology in 7.AdvancedTopics.rst Message-ID: References: <20260728091038.171033-1-chenyou910331@gmail.com> <20260728091038.171033-2-chenyou910331@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20260728091038.171033-2-chenyou910331@gmail.com> X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT On Tue, Jul 28, 2026 at 05:10:23PM +0800, Chen-Yu Yeh wrote: > Localize mainland terms to Taiwanese Mandarin (內核→核心, 軟件→軟體, > 高級→進階, 項目→專案, 用戶→使用者, ...) and sync with the English > original (Github → GitHub). > > update to commit 5ce70894f6ca ("Doc: correct spelling and wording > mistakes") Reviewed-by: Weijie Yuan > Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Yeh > --- > .../zh_TW/process/7.AdvancedTopics.rst | 110 +++++++++--------- > 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-) A small gripe: what is the best practice for reviewing a new revision of a patch series after it has been rerolled? For this series, I found the output of b4 diff rather difficult to read, so I had to split out the individual patches and inspect them using git mailinfo and interdiff. That, however, means losing the built-in highlighting provided by b4 diff. In this case, I would say a range-diff/interdiff for each patch seems to be a good solution in general, while obviously that's not that convenient for the patch sender. Perhaps there is no best solution to this problem; Git may simply not be expected to handle Chinese text particularly well. I would appreciate it if some one more experienced could give me some tips. But this series is however quite special. Usually we won't meet a large series which contains many diffs in it like this. Then I suppose we'll just have to ride out these growing pains. ;-)