The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
To: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched: Skip class callbacks with SCHED_FLAG_KEEP_PARAMS
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2026 10:57:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <amsR-TI6PwM6cfh-@gpd4> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <93830a3d-c85e-4aee-b293-b9fbbdbf61dc@amd.com>

Hi Prateek,

On Thu, Jul 30, 2026 at 12:59:37PM +0530, K Prateek Nayak wrote:
> Hello Andrea,
> 
> On 7/30/2026 11:20 AM, Andrea Righi wrote:
> > SCHED_FLAG_KEEP_PARAMS suppresses scheduler parameter and class changes,
> > but __sched_setscheduler() can still set DEQUEUE_CLASS when the class
> > computed from the requested policy differs from the task's current
> > class.
> > 
> > This causes the switching_from(), switched_from(), switching_to() and
> > switched_to() callbacks to run even though p->sched_class remains
> > unchanged.
> > 
> > Set DEQUEUE_CLASS only when the sched class is allowed to change.
> > 
> > Fixes: 637b0682821b ("sched: Fold sched_class::switch{ing,ed}_{to,from}() into the change pattern")
> > Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
> > ---
> >  kernel/sched/syscalls.c | 3 ++-
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/syscalls.c b/kernel/sched/syscalls.c
> > index b215b0ead9a60..903b47f5d0b74 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/syscalls.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/syscalls.c
> > @@ -675,7 +675,8 @@ int __sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p,
> >  	prev_class = p->sched_class;
> >  	next_class = __setscheduler_class(policy, newprio);
> >  
> > -	if (prev_class != next_class)
> > +	if (!(attr->sched_flags & SCHED_FLAG_KEEP_PARAMS) &&
> > +	    prev_class != next_class)
> >  		queue_flags |= DEQUEUE_CLASS;
> 
> It seems there also exists a SCHED_FLAG_KEEP_POLICY which should be used
> to retain the policy. By a quick look at the syscall path,
> SCHED_FLAG_KEEP_PARAMS should just do an equivalent of:
> 
>     get_params(p, &attr, 0)
> 
> and match the some properties of sched_attr with that of the task.

I think get_params() only copies the parameters relevant to the task's current
policy. For example, for a fair task it copies sched_nice, but not
sched_priority or the deadline parameters. Allowing an arbitrary cross-class
transition could still apply target-class parameters supplied by the caller
despite KEEP_PARAMS.

> 
> The task is still free to switch classes if the attr->sched_policy
> differs given SCHED_FLAG_KEEP_PARAMS and SCHED_FLAG_KEEP_POLICY are two
> distinct flags and there is a separate SCHED_FLAG_KEEP_ALL to combines
> them both.
> 
> I'm having a sneaky suspicion that the bit in sched_change guard below
> should actually check for SCHED_FLAG_KEEP_ALL like:
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/syscalls.c b/kernel/sched/syscalls.c
> index b215b0ead9a6..baf1fc59069e 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/syscalls.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/syscalls.c
> @@ -680,7 +680,7 @@ int __sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p,
>  
>  	scoped_guard (sched_change, p, queue_flags) {
>  
> -		if (!(attr->sched_flags & SCHED_FLAG_KEEP_PARAMS)) {
> +		if ((attr->sched_flags & SCHED_FLAG_KEEP_ALL) != SCHED_FLAG_KEEP_ALL) {

Changing this condition to SCHED_FLAG_KEEP_ALL would execute the full parameter
and class update when only SCHED_FLAG_KEEP_PARAMS is set, enabling the
problematic cross-class case.

IIUC, SCHED_FLAG_KEEP_POLICY is handled independently: the syscall replaces
attr->sched_policy with SETPARAM_POLICY, which is resolved to the task's current
policy under the rq lock. Parameter changes are still allowed in that case, so
the __setscheduler_params() block must run.

For this fix, I think DEQUEUE_CLASS should follow the existing update condition,
so that the class callbacks reflect whether p->sched_class is actually changed.

Thanks,
-Andrea

>  			__setscheduler_params(p, attr);
>  			p->sched_class = next_class;
>  			p->prio = newprio;
> ---
> 
> >  
> >  	scoped_guard (sched_change, p, queue_flags) {
> 
> -- 
> Thanks and Regards,
> Prateek
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-30  8:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-30  5:50 [PATCH 0/2] sched: Fix SCHED_FLAG_KEEP_PARAMS side effects Andrea Righi
2026-07-30  5:50 ` [PATCH 1/2] sched: Skip class callbacks with SCHED_FLAG_KEEP_PARAMS Andrea Righi
2026-07-30  7:29   ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-07-30  8:57     ` Andrea Righi [this message]
2026-07-30  9:57     ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-07-30 11:42       ` Andrea Righi
2026-07-30  5:56 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched/deadline: Skip bandwidth accounting " Andrea Righi
2026-07-30 10:04   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-07-30  9:32 ` [PATCH 0/2] sched: Fix SCHED_FLAG_KEEP_PARAMS side effects Peter Zijlstra
2026-07-30  9:52   ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=amsR-TI6PwM6cfh-@gpd4 \
    --to=arighi@nvidia.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=patrick.bellasi@arm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox