From: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
To: Guopeng Zhang <guopeng.zhang@linux.dev>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
Harry Yoo <harry@kernel.org>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Guopeng Zhang <zhangguopeng@kylinos.cn>,
Ran Xiaokai <ran.xiaokai@zte.com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: memcg: fix slab over-accounting for in-object objcg metadata
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2026 16:44:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <an0E_lt2_53GBWjt@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260812124858.73487-1-guopeng.zhang@linux.dev>
On Wed, Aug 12, 2026 at 08:48:58PM +0800, Guopeng Zhang wrote:
> From: Guopeng Zhang <zhangguopeng@kylinos.cn>
>
> obj_full_size() adds the size of an obj_cgroup pointer to s->size to
> account for slabobj_ext storage, which normally resides outside the
> object.
>
> Since commit a77d6d338685 ("mm/slab: place slabobj_ext metadata in
> unused space within s->size"), slabobj_ext can reside in object padding
> already covered by s->size. The extra charge then accounts for the same
> memory twice.
>
> The per-slab obj_exts_in_object bit introduced by commit b5bc35ace2c5
> ("mm/slab: replace slab.stride with obj_exts_in_object") identifies this
> layout. Use it to omit the extra charge only for in-object metadata.
> Unlike in-object metadata, slab-leftover and separately allocated metadata
> are not covered by the per-object s->size charge, so retain the existing
> charge for those cases.
>
> Reported-by: Ran Xiaokai <ran.xiaokai@zte.com.cn>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260310113804.245647-1-ranxiaokai627@163.com/
> Fixes: a77d6d338685 ("mm/slab: place slabobj_ext metadata in unused space within s->size")
> Signed-off-by: Guopeng Zhang <zhangguopeng@kylinos.cn>
This looks good to me but would love to have Harry's comment on it.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-12 23:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-12 12:48 [PATCH] mm: memcg: fix slab over-accounting for in-object objcg metadata Guopeng Zhang
2026-08-12 13:48 ` Tao Cui
2026-08-12 23:44 ` Shakeel Butt [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=an0E_lt2_53GBWjt@linux.dev \
--to=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=guopeng.zhang@linux.dev \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=harry@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=ran.xiaokai@zte.com.cn \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=zhangguopeng@kylinos.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox