From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 413CD331EC1 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2026 15:44:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785771844; cv=none; b=F93FqOAw/jlvfZUE2SpM8qZTO0sJsM2IgvuP/Tr76YUyw3w8ZY3UVuksILh+4gyIVCx4xaH2KqidNYBUIBe2w7wT+dy5GhPHzwJMKrIlfQk1jgryvYGyGNqI7Q/CcghfmOXQ/qIKvDHFV7bn4wEQpKRXr2TivWQ2BZ44H3NDyiY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785771844; c=relaxed/simple; bh=OCpKNpJbng2H1nCZaJMevHIttFMiF0X9TCGm3pr408k=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=lqnmTHZkQ+x0IZFBU9U5ldqmzb9XEMe6FB5hoSHF3zLOe4uP4j49WN4c5ry6cGptLxN1UVDeBDsLdAb2wyWEixF7P36WAOoc44Hv6Sc+yv2geSqa48Vi2q9mpLC/wlNnkV4RQ/C3Ll4CHjYBSbgQD4XRz+CbqtsBVLfmgrIcK7s= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=B1KKKa4K; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="B1KKKa4K" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B02E81F000E9; Mon, 3 Aug 2026 15:44:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1785771842; bh=CKqv92Ry2ujFVe+TZU7zFWPnXc/Df16wv3YsAopR1ok=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=B1KKKa4KBwO8kiwq3cOipW10YgiJ0Y6nVZXN4rkSlNvfy6jOaWEsWipasLUdXYZ2f +AuzWtS8rS/1pLVyBX/9ePv9d2MnHGD60bASkQ2Cy8VGpUXtyiONiSjAkARo/8FV1D nj+ZiSr7oAmJ5ZXJQ5G2NqaD/lLsCxAKjZgX+uuMCbjyEO9Ue6754/N3lVAS+dcChc 1LmEpxgC61A4PteNgjLI/eV+ddGvCU2lrbvsIS0VrfETADJh0PJ4xFSfqEFFT/TDg6 MY8BMPkbsFisjcnHjcwbwtAtJM9M/4F72NLosEZPwi5OhcmjbayEGfOWFMbo2A9uZb JvAMnL/D8o9MA== Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2026 05:43:59 -1000 From: Keith Busch To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: santhosh kumar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , Ming Lei , x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] PCI_IRQ_AFFINITY limits MSI-X allocation on 384 CPU / 1000+ NVMe system Message-ID: References: <87cxw6hgli.ffs@fw13> <87ldasfwht.ffs@fw13> <87ik5wfeju.ffs@fw13> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87ik5wfeju.ffs@fw13> On Thu, Jul 30, 2026 at 09:44:21PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Thu, Jul 30 2026 at 07:28, Keith Busch wrote: > > We can introduce a module parameter to throttle down the maximum number > > of IO queues to allocate per controller. I don't think the driver can > > automatically reason out what the correct number should be because it > > doesn't know how many devices it's going to see. > > I might be missing something here as usual, but the number of io queues > per controller does not affect that at all as I explained before. Oh, you did explain that. I skipped to the end as I had too many distractions last week. Sorry about that, and thanks for the re-explanation. I mistakenly was thinking the effective_affinity was the only hardware resource used. Back to the drawing board.