From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05A38415F34; Mon, 3 Aug 2026 13:49:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785764974; cv=none; b=U6WsOnKD2z/Uo6ZJcXyo3N9Kb8cNBj2zoQ4dzdgVh3sNBf+cDocwk9Ke5anfu/8GHLEbe8vZkOD85Ipdab6vXvHu8bLK1lrMqwbR2nerQwLEDt/sQUclUfYqFLI7vZBYGSuNzhdG5UlLcf+qCI4LsYA/cxH/BwApKS1BcHv7ePU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785764974; c=relaxed/simple; bh=RDdpyCKc15NK9uw2pBkfSrDD+en2rKAJPfOEa+//Elg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=RmmE47EO2bEVZqAnb6Svf9gqZ+rbRP8Td/xqrwiP37BnpgAhVeFDY/LC8Imz/Knol55goD/Z5x631sf3dhAZ84CDgnY2p26KrRDljwmZ+9yoxEVMvltF3dD9mE87Fl/n5ToZ7sbXuYTgf00ZajG7YqNgGjm8Qa7O8eoeRWqqTN8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=arm.com header.i=@arm.com header.b=pyBDnvjD; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=arm.com header.i=@arm.com header.b="pyBDnvjD" Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55DE81476; Mon, 3 Aug 2026 06:49:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from arm.com (usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C81693F66F; Mon, 3 Aug 2026 06:49:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=arm.com; s=foss; t=1785764971; bh=RDdpyCKc15NK9uw2pBkfSrDD+en2rKAJPfOEa+//Elg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=pyBDnvjDoyaRYk+MG4Ev641S05Hf5gyE3GRP2/eECObJNpWEoJpix+UF3tgrxPLeW shzjjcdLwOqIitUYsR5c5s1MO29/Z20LMTALuHB+BQG2Wb2zqndYK40IL0XKqr6Unn Ux4+f+2YDpu/9ILumuY2Ivo7LwrFHp7wxItKeMbc= Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2026 14:49:25 +0100 From: Catalin Marinas To: Breno Leitao Cc: Andrew Morton , Jonathan Corbet , Shuah Khan , David Hildenbrand , Lorenzo Stoakes , "Liam R. Howlett" , Vlastimil Babka , Mike Rapoport , Suren Baghdasaryan , Michal Hocko , Shuah Khan , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, workflows@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] selftests/mm: kmemleak: drop stale min_unref_scans default from comments Message-ID: References: <20260731-kmemleak_hardened-v2-0-7b9689ac77cb@debian.org> <20260731-kmemleak_hardened-v2-3-7b9689ac77cb@debian.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260731-kmemleak_hardened-v2-3-7b9689ac77cb@debian.org> On Fri, Jul 31, 2026 at 03:13:06AM -0700, Breno Leitao wrote: > The test writes min_unref_scans explicitly for every case, so its comments > describing 1 as the default are both unnecessary and, since the default is > now conditional, wrong. Refer to the threshold values directly. > > No functional change. > > Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao Acked-by: Catalin Marinas