From: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@redhat.com>
To: Samuel Moelius <sam.moelius@trailofbits.com>
Cc: Alasdair Kergon <agk@redhat.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>,
Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>,
"open list:DEVICE-MAPPER (LVM)" <dm-devel@lists.linux.dev>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dm dust: make badblock messages target-relative
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2026 11:50:45 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <anIKVT_EMGB2EgLZ@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260803140905.383600.be823861719c.dm-dust-badblock-coordinate-mismatch@trailofbits.com>
On Mon, Aug 03, 2026 at 02:09:13PM +0000, Samuel Moelius wrote:
> dm-dust currently treats addbadblock, removebadblock and queryblock
> arguments as block numbers on the underlying device. That is surprising
> for a device-mapper target: a dm-dust table with a non-zero backing
> offset can add bad blocks that are outside the mapped target, and a
> badblock added for logical block 0 is missed because the I/O path checks
> the remapped backing-device block instead.
>
> Interpret badblock message arguments as blocks relative to the start of
> the dm-dust target instead. Bound the arguments by the target length and
> perform badblock lookup using target-relative sectors before remapping
> the bio to the underlying device.
>
> This intentionally changes the non-zero backing-offset behavior to make
> the badblock control interface match the mapped dm-dust device, rather
> than the underlying device.
>
> Assisted-by: Codex:gpt-5.5-cyber-preview
> Signed-off-by: Samuel Moelius <sam.moelius@trailofbits.com>
Reviewed-by: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@redhat.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Revise commit message
> - Remove call to sector_div() in __dust_map_write()
>
> drivers/md/dm-dust.c | 16 +++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-04 15:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-03 14:09 [PATCH v2] dm dust: make badblock messages target-relative Samuel Moelius
2026-08-04 15:18 ` Bryan Gurney
2026-08-04 15:50 ` Benjamin Marzinski [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=anIKVT_EMGB2EgLZ@redhat.com \
--to=bmarzins@redhat.com \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
--cc=sam.moelius@trailofbits.com \
--cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox