The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
	Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@suse.com>,
	Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@kernel.org>,
	Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>,
	Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@atomlin.com>,
	Shyam Saini <shyamsaini@linux.microsoft.com>,
	Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
	Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@linux.dev>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-modules@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] module: remove MODULE_VERSION()
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2026 08:55:42 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <anILftPYWfY3y-Ba@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260731-module_ver_remove-v2-1-c9163858f382@linuxfoundation.org>

On Fri, Jul 31, 2026 at 03:02:23PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> Module "versions" do not make sense as the kernel is built all at once,
> the "version" is the overall kernel version number, so modules can not
> really be described as having a unique version given that they rely on
> the infrastructure of the whole kernel.
> 
> For now, just make this an "empty" define, to keep existing code
> building properly as the tree is slowly purged of the use of this over
> time.
> 
> This macro will be removed entirely in the future when there are no
> in-tree users.

Looks good:

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>


  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-04 15:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-31 13:02 [PATCH v2 0/2] module: remove MODULE_VERSION() and srcversion Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-07-31 13:02 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] module: remove MODULE_VERSION() Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-08-04 15:55   ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2026-07-31 13:02 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] module: remove srcversion module attribute Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-08-04 14:35   ` Petr Pavlu
2026-08-04 15:55   ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=anILftPYWfY3y-Ba@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=atomlin@atomlin.com \
    --cc=da.gomez@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-modules@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=petr.pavlu@suse.com \
    --cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
    --cc=shyamsaini@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=thorsten.blum@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox