From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E1324A13B9 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2026 17:43:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785865419; cv=none; b=CrexyGLXW9zclBjEbg+yA48Qke45+Bmwjh4xwIu8qbyRG99kaWcBA6f3FkXA0rYuVS2ksmdXOCLpksHZ2ipIkQAzV4995t64WhGjGvp0SJ3IjJD9KK88MMdfXrdhCXHnn1wYdgO05PyMlvjgzxPnM5WKNe4Yt6UGhUTB17KGS0Y= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785865419; c=relaxed/simple; bh=L6Uf2c867TDwYaalTHnJ665CrL0WdsY4MBMaTD1tPjI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=dVPQD2vysOagXOt++4fOT+RBvQlpUJ9r/SHC1HaMBLkcnbsoH0iA0ZD5D+tEWmM8mHawEmbAJ3yryd6YLyRpNuxH6JdUDNhnuMBcHPDY/NgcfXDvpW2ae2z6CpiO253mGyPB+e5w8TUW1a1FNU4GziD0Na+YmjMhQbLda01EG94= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=QX5S6ObZ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="QX5S6ObZ" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9FE241F00A3A; Tue, 4 Aug 2026 17:43:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1785865417; bh=Q0QTEeJQf3/zWplPcA0s8h0RGuqFQM0zbVtJezzoWUQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=QX5S6ObZN4teGPR9mi6vVsSIYTmLop3gg1yZUZ5N7djl890cNrM5p+xt7/TpavL/h SNizvS2l8fdbdcWykFKySaxM6bRkPtH8LMeR2QUvDuAQV+JJAvDpgaH5jlc9+cqf4y iUDAj/HttXybIiLI9uHf4/TDFI4os8t8D8FahzSdiQQXTb2ycgD/U3EwltRVL6/3qy 2ahf+QKIk9I7TSTSb0E1iaIBwvt8B18BPrh2FBJJFNuEppvIljz3Hq+peJMb97BA43 AWBjYLbA9SAJTfMEkunI+1sfej364Lkgl9516aymVNoG1SB61AQz50F4UAAsHBGVz2 w6QpqFQ4VAhLQ== Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2026 19:43:31 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Thorsten Blum Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Ard Biesheuvel , "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" , Andrew Morton , Arnd Bergmann , Thomas Zimmermann , "Pratyush Yadav (Google)" , Harshit Mogalapalli , Breno Leitao , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: Use IS_ENABLED() for built-in-or-module checks Message-ID: References: <20260804115227.62158-4-thorsten.blum@linux.dev> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260804115227.62158-4-thorsten.blum@linux.dev> * Thorsten Blum wrote: > Replace open-coded built-in-or-module checks for CONFIG_APM, CONFIG_EDD, > and CONFIG_X86_SPEEDSTEP_SMI with IS_ENABLED(). Please include the phrase "No change in functionality intended." or so in the changelog, when there's no side effect expected. Thanks, Ingo