The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)" <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>,
	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com>,
	Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/7] Switch Arm SMCCC firmware services to an SMCCC bus
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2026 10:51:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <anMHs65s6Mk-ZRdT@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260805063255.1638614-1-aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>

On Wed, Aug 05, 2026 at 12:02:48PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm) wrote:
> Changes from v8:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260707081351.1680209-1-aneesh.kumar@kernel.org
> * Rebase onto the arm64 for-next/core branch.

Was there a dependency on anything in for-next/core? We normally apply
series on their own branch on top of the vanilla kernel (e.g. 7.2-rc3)
and merge everything together in for-next/core. We (and many other
maintainers) strongly prefer series posted on top of an -rc kernel
(typically -rc1 to -rc3) unless there's a dependency on a different
branch. Never based on -next or -next like branches (which is what
for-next/core is, as the name implies).

> * Move the RSI code from arch/arm64 to drivers/firmware/arm_rmm in patch 3.

Thanks for this.

-- 
Catalin

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-08-05  9:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-05  6:32 [PATCH v9 0/7] Switch Arm SMCCC firmware services to an SMCCC bus Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-08-05  6:32 ` [PATCH v9 1/7] firmware: smccc: Add an Arm " Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-08-05  6:32 ` [PATCH v9 2/7] firmware: hwrng: arm_smccc_trng: Register as an SMCCC device Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-08-05 11:08   ` Catalin Marinas
2026-08-05  6:32 ` [PATCH v9 3/7] firmware: arm_rmm: Move RSI support out of arch/arm64 Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-08-05 11:21   ` Catalin Marinas
2026-08-05 13:05     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-08-05  6:32 ` [PATCH v9 4/7] arm64: realm: Move Realm memory encryption ops to RSI code Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-08-05  6:32 ` [PATCH v9 5/7] virt: coco: arm-cca-guest: Rename TSM report source file Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-08-05  6:32 ` [PATCH v9 6/7] firmware: smccc: arm-cca-guest: Bind the TSM provider to an SMCCC device Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-08-05  6:32 ` [PATCH v9 7/7] coco: guest: arm64: Replace dummy CCA device with sysfs ABI Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-08-05  9:51 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2026-08-05 12:22   ` [PATCH v9 0/7] Switch Arm SMCCC firmware services to an SMCCC bus Aneesh Kumar K.V

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=anMHs65s6Mk-ZRdT@arm.com \
    --to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jeremy.linton@arm.com \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=steven.price@arm.com \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox