From: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
To: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>,
Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>, Mete Durlu <meted@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] sched/fair: Prefer fully idle cores for NOHZ balancing
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2026 15:18:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <anSJwRhbVd0Lh0oe@gpd4> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9153b101-583a-43ac-831a-6f4d78468b25@linux.ibm.com>
Hi Shrikanth,
On Thu, Aug 06, 2026 at 03:56:20PM +0530, Shrikanth Hegde wrote:
...
> I have only a small system at this moment.
> I don't see any noticeable regression/improvement in SMT4.
>
> FWIW, patch looks okay to me.
> Reviewed-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
Thanks for testing!
>
>
> BTW, Andrea, are you planning to do that refactoring of select_rq_mask
> or you want me to pick it up?
I was waiting for this patch to land before looking at the select_rq_mask
refactoring. If you have time and would like to pick it up, please go ahead,
I'll be happy to review it.
-Andrea
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-06 13:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-04 15:13 [PATCH v4] sched/fair: Prefer fully idle cores for NOHZ balancing Andrea Righi
2026-08-04 15:19 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-08-04 18:09 ` Andrea Righi
2026-08-04 21:18 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-08-05 10:31 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-08-06 10:26 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-08-06 13:18 ` Andrea Righi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=anSJwRhbVd0Lh0oe@gpd4 \
--to=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=christian.loehle@arm.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=meted@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pauld@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox