From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 454FC1C5D59; Thu, 6 Aug 2026 15:56:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786031822; cv=none; b=YIw7zJlqw3sAermEIVshP6kHxwo4KQQ8ZIAXP6TFANV8BkdsUVZ3LWNq8usEXDVMkcQ49oKE77WpADkOJ4shqPo6T31MxOzKGNcQoMfxFiuOXnGy7q4FF8OXfbWwjr0PZfFbfVcM6wnGXe5DzeZVSkfvMaJf1KDr09L0hfWSYOc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786031822; c=relaxed/simple; bh=bFFnoiobBKVyuNZ+m4G7xjmeqhICpTklxvC92YBlj6Y=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=icGvxLOgV+EbRMHQ9hNSGo/6i62e+CpdWHskSN3f7BNk0e9Y3gcWUxZGAyeLIHMbkX68fxnJ00j1hVUEVKyuLV5U6r53hToexMvqh6BnFEWC1P/LHtb51YK4v1KBmYNT+wzhZJg378B8RdolYpk5xVD89mPlISW7CQlxugS4qX4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=aM8CzvZL; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="aM8CzvZL" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 372BF1F000E9; Thu, 6 Aug 2026 15:56:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1786031817; bh=pjRHKsliqvvLYwqfQ+GA2Px/s3f/hlLeRUQ/A/a3Vhc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=aM8CzvZL1kM8bogCR4THoedGsE0LsrmHOW+9scLTFef8/T7iNfbQbqgwneQlJrmVb zwDA/h8baSVPt2RNqX39wKuflTMuCV7OidrA01gdihp3LswRdZ7e+J5VEwE/nNb32j B5uTIT+0mN7qqbN+Sg5xFSbj/4/5/UpX8PJQmbiID9wudtYkOuu71mfSYwjGdKy508 r3gSTDHRJgOkLV1tKT5/fE6Dy1EeShHego3b067oJpOC1sph9rk9odxLj2/cTaWJye +PK4PYBpH9fbPU7d0IkzyCPiCRWtpDcphDgFnF1qfCmWTBVy7uwOMJXI+NIMpixzBY 6DZ7QBk91fWrw== Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2026 21:26:53 +0530 From: Vinod Koul To: Michael Riesch Cc: jason98166@gmail.com, Neil Armstrong , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Heiko Stuebner , Guochun Huang , Philipp Zabel , linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: phy: rockchip,rk3588-mipi-dcphy: support per-direction phys Message-ID: References: <20260726-dcphy-rx-v1-v2-0-cf9cc34a412a@gmail.com> <20260726-dcphy-rx-v1-v2-1-cf9cc34a412a@gmail.com> <82da3622-9c3a-454c-87bc-fb4ec7adb68d@collabora.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <82da3622-9c3a-454c-87bc-fb4ec7adb68d@collabora.com> On 03-08-26, 13:17, Michael Riesch wrote: > > + Two cells select the PHY type and the direction, so that the > > + transmitter (DSI) and the receiver (CSI) can be described as > > + independent consumers of the same PHY: > > + - > > + - > > How is that Rockchip specific? As you state above this is either MIPI > CSI or MIPI DSI, two perfectly standard protocols. > > @all Would it be reasonable to introduce PHY_TYPE_CSI and PHY_TYPE_DSI? I think yes... -- ~Vinod