From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Joel Granados <joel.granados@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH sysctl-next 2/2] sysctl: remove redundant CONFIG_PROC_FS checks
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2026 17:48:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <anX-O-yWjzHJ1KOe@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <anX-II_sAoJQy83X@redhat.com>
Now that CONFIG_PROC_SYSCTL is gone, CONFIG_SYSCTL depends on
CONFIG_PROC_FS directly in fs/proc/Kconfig, so the double guard
defined(CONFIG_SYSCTL) && defined(CONFIG_PROC_FS) is redundant.
Simplify to "#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL".
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
drivers/parport/procfs.c | 8 ++++----
fs/dcache.c | 2 +-
fs/file_table.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/parport/procfs.c b/drivers/parport/procfs.c
index 3880460e67f2..68a24e17a68f 100644
--- a/drivers/parport/procfs.c
+++ b/drivers/parport/procfs.c
@@ -26,9 +26,9 @@
#include <linux/uaccess.h>
-#if defined(CONFIG_SYSCTL) && defined(CONFIG_PROC_FS)
+#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
-#define PARPORT_MIN_TIMESLICE_VALUE 1ul
+#define PARPORT_MIN_TIMESLICE_VALUE 1ul
#define PARPORT_MAX_TIMESLICE_VALUE ((unsigned long) HZ)
#define PARPORT_MIN_SPINTIME_VALUE 1
#define PARPORT_MAX_SPINTIME_VALUE 1000
@@ -560,7 +560,7 @@ static void __exit parport_default_proc_unregister(void)
parport_bus_exit();
}
-#else /* no sysctl or no procfs*/
+#else /* CONFIG_SYSCTL */
int parport_proc_register(struct parport *pp)
{
@@ -591,7 +591,7 @@ static void __exit parport_default_proc_unregister (void)
{
parport_bus_exit();
}
-#endif
+#endif /* CONFIG_SYSCTL */
subsys_initcall(parport_default_proc_register)
module_exit(parport_default_proc_unregister)
diff --git a/fs/dcache.c b/fs/dcache.c
index 3e9af9de7074..cb8a6b04a17a 100644
--- a/fs/dcache.c
+++ b/fs/dcache.c
@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(long, nr_dentry_unused);
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(long, nr_dentry_negative);
static int dentry_negative_policy;
-#if defined(CONFIG_SYSCTL) && defined(CONFIG_PROC_FS)
+#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
/* Statistics gathering. */
static struct dentry_stat_t dentry_stat = {
.age_limit = 45,
diff --git a/fs/file_table.c b/fs/file_table.c
index c68b8c0a4097..08ca3631b726 100644
--- a/fs/file_table.c
+++ b/fs/file_table.c
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ unsigned long get_max_files(void)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(get_max_files);
-#if defined(CONFIG_SYSCTL) && defined(CONFIG_PROC_FS)
+#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
/*
* Handle nr_files sysctl
--
2.52.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-07 15:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-07 15:47 [PATCH sysctl-next 1/2] sysctl: collapse redundant CONFIG_SYSCTL nesting in kernel/sysctl.c Oleg Nesterov
2026-08-07 15:48 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2026-08-07 18:01 ` [PATCH sysctl-next 2/2] sysctl: remove redundant CONFIG_PROC_FS checks Bradley Morgan
2026-08-07 17:16 ` [PATCH sysctl-next 1/2] sysctl: collapse redundant CONFIG_SYSCTL nesting in kernel/sysctl.c Bradley Morgan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=anX-O-yWjzHJ1KOe@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=joel.granados@kernel.org \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox