Re: [PATCH RESEND v2] iio: accel: fxls8962af: clamp FIFO sample count

["Shengzhuo Wei" <me@cherr.cc>]

On 2026-08-10 00:31, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
 
> Same comments as similar patches.
> - Not a fix, but rather hardening against buggy hardware.
> - Don't hide the problem by clamping.  If this happens in the wild
>   we want to know about it!
> 

Hi Jonathan,

Thanks for the feedback. I also just realized that this patch
duplicates Bryam Vargas's "iio: accel: fxls8962af: clamp the
device-reported FIFO sample count", which you've already applied — I
sent mine before noticing Bryam had gotten there first.

Since Bryam's is already in, how would you like to handle it? Either:

- just conclude here, since Bryam's already covers fxls8962af (I'll
drop mine); or

- rework to the error-out approach you described — though your
feedback (don't clamp, report it) applies just as much to Bryam's
version, so that would need the same treatment.

If you'd like the rework, the fix I'd propose is: instead of clamping
count to FXLS8962AF_FIFO_LENGTH, treat an out-of-range count as a
hardware error — dev_err() and skip the flush (don't carry on
reading), so a malfunctioning device shows up rather than being
silently papered over.

Happy to go either way.

Best regards,
Shengzhuo Wei