public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Why does x86_64 support a SuSE-specific ioctl?
Date: 5 Oct 2002 00:56:31 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <anm5vf$m6p$1@cesium.transmeta.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: p73adltqz9g.fsf@oldwotan.suse.de

Followup to:  <p73adltqz9g.fsf@oldwotan.suse.de>
By author:    Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de> writes:
> > 
> > TIOCGDEV is (as the comment above indicates) in neither 2.4.20-pre9 nor in
> > 2.5.40 and I'm wondering why the x86_64 kernel supports a SuSE-specific
> > i386 ioctl?
> 
> Why not? 
> 
> I resubmitted the TIOCGDEV patch to Marcelo now, which implements it 
> for the console device.
> 

> -
> +		case TIOCGDEV:
> +			return put_user (kdev_t_to_nr (real_tty->device), (unsigned int*) arg);

This is broken -- you're returning a dev_t as an unsigned int.  On
i386 that means overwriting two bytes of userspace you shouldn't be,
and if dev_t > unsigned int in the future it has the opposite problem.
Note that this is different from TIOCGPTN which return a pts number,
not a dev_t.

	-hpa
-- 
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt	<amsp@zytor.com>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-10-05  7:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <Pine.NEB.4.44.0210041654570.11119-100000@mimas.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2002-10-05  4:35 ` Why does x86_64 support a SuSE-specific ioctl? Andi Kleen
2002-10-05  5:04   ` Jeff Garzik
2002-10-05  5:10     ` Andi Kleen
2002-10-05 13:21       ` Alan Cox
2002-10-05 15:19         ` TIOCGDEV Andi Kleen
2002-10-05 17:00         ` Why does x86_64 support a SuSE-specific ioctl? Miquel van Smoorenburg
2002-10-09 18:03           ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2002-10-05  7:56   ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2002-10-05 15:00     ` Andi Kleen
2002-10-07 17:48       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2002-10-05 13:20   ` Alan Cox
2002-10-05 14:36     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-10-04 14:59 Adrian Bunk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='anm5vf$m6p$1@cesium.transmeta.com' \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox