The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>,
	 "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: x86: missing FRED #PF event data?
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2026 06:51:47 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <annXc0-kQ9ZWz9pa@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260810092328.GH1642880@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On Mon, Aug 10, 2026, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2026 at 06:09:43PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > On (26/08/10 11:03), Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > > > > and got the following while running my tests (and well, we don't crash
> > > > > > anymore):
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > [  254.040223] :: fixed up address to ffff9c4d64af4000  [[fred: 0 cr2: ffff9c4d64af4000]]
> > > > > > ...
> > > > > > [ 1821.904563] :: fixed up address to ffff9c4e9dd0a000  [[fred: 0 cr2: ffff9c4e9dd0a000]]
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Does any of this make sense to you?
> > > > > 
> > > > > I think the explanation is some pKVM shenanigans.  Sorry for the noise.
> > > > 
> > > > No, I think we are back at square one.  I thought that maybe pKVM
> > > > was disabling FRED and that was causing issues.  But I actually see
> > > > that both cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_FRED) and (cr4 & X86_CR4_FRED)
> > > > claim FRED is enabled, yet fred #PF data is 0 while CR2 holds the correct
> > > > address.
> > > 
> > > Can you reproduce on real hardware? I mean, you were babbling about pKVM
> > > (whatever that is), so I'm thinking you're on some dodgy virt thing.
> > > 
> > > Not that I have any actual FRED hardware to test anything on :/
> > 
> > It's an actual H/W, a laptop (Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 355 powered),
> > I was babbling about pKVM because it seems that the best way to
> > reproduce is to launch a VM, yet the crash is happening on the host
> > side.
> 
> Urg, ok, lets wait for hpa to wake up. He's the one that knows most
> about FRED.

But to Peter's point, babbling about pKVM suggests that you're running out-of-tree
patches to enable pKVM on x86, which means this could be a bug somewhere in those
out-of-tree patches.  And if you're indeed running pKVM, it also probably means
the "host" is deprivileged into a VM, which brings KVM and virtualization back
into the mix as possible suspects.

So, is this happening on a kernel that's fairly close to a vanilla upstream, or
is it indeed happening on a pKVM-capable kernel?

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-10 13:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-10  6:49 x86: missing FRED #PF event data? Sergey Senozhatsky
2026-08-10  7:38 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2026-08-10  8:58   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2026-08-10  9:03     ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-10  9:09       ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2026-08-10  9:23         ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-10 13:51           ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2026-08-10 14:47             ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2026-08-10 10:06         ` David Laight
2026-08-10 10:40           ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2026-08-10 15:40     ` H. Peter Anvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=annXc0-kQ9ZWz9pa@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox