The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Beata Michalska <beata.michalska@arm.com>
To: Sean Wang <seanwang1@lenovo.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	rafael@kernel.org, Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
	Lifeng Zheng <zhenglifeng1@huawei.com>,
	Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan@unisoc.com>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
	Sumit Gupta <sumitg@nvidia.com>,
	Yunhui Cui <cuiyunhui@bytedance.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, driver-core@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] arm64: topology: add source check in arch_cpu_idle_enter()
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2026 12:02:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <anrzT-ez3b7uYaCt@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260811072830.10028-1-seanwang1@lenovo.com>

On Tue, Aug 11, 2026 at 03:28:30PM +0800, Sean Wang wrote:
> arch_cpu_idle_enter() directly calls amu_scale_freq_tick() to update
> arch_freq_scale when a CPU enters idle. This bypasses the sft_data
> pointer check that topology_clear_scale_freq_source() relies on.
> 
> As a result, even after calling topology_clear_scale_freq_source()
> with SCALE_FREQ_SOURCE_ARCH to disable AMU-based frequency scaling,
> the arch_freq_scale value can still be modified by AMU counters when
> the CPU goes idle through the arch_cpu_idle_enter() path.
> 
> Add topology_is_scale_freq_source() helper to check whether a specific
> frequency scaling source is currently registered for a CPU. Use it
> in arch_cpu_idle_enter() to verify that AMU is the active source
> before calling amu_scale_freq_tick().
> 
> This ensures that topology_clear_scale_freq_source() properly
> disables AMU updates in both the tick path (already handled by
> topology_scale_freq_tick()) and the idle path.
> 
> Co-developed-by: Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan@unisoc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan@unisoc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Wang <seanwang1@lenovo.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c  |  3 ++-
>  drivers/base/arch_topology.c  | 13 +++++++++++++
>  include/linux/arch_topology.h |  1 +
>  3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
> index b32f13358fbb..1dbd8f4c3178 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
> @@ -175,7 +175,8 @@ void arch_cpu_idle_enter(void)
>  
>  	/* Kick in AMU update but only if one has not happened already */
>  	if (housekeeping_cpu(cpu, HK_TYPE_TICK) &&
> -	    time_is_before_jiffies(per_cpu(cpu_amu_samples.last_scale_update, cpu)))
> +	    time_is_before_jiffies(per_cpu(cpu_amu_samples.last_scale_update, cpu)) &&
> +	    topology_is_scale_freq_source(SCALE_FREQ_SOURCE_ARCH, cpu))
>  		amu_scale_freq_tick();
I'm not entirely convinced you gained a lot by that.
It's one additional check per each enter_idle for case where AMUs are the
source vs 2 additional check when it is not.
Will try to figure out smth less 'invasive'.

Aside: I should have probably asked that earlier, but I am not sure I do fully
understand the case we are trying to fix here.
The topology_set_scale_freq_source prefers arch source to others. So if the AMUs
were chosen to server as the source for the freq scale - I do not see why the
sfd would be changed. That would require calling sequence clear-set to get a
different source in place. I do understand the issue itself, though how did we
end up there in the first place ?

---
BR
Beata
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
> index 8c5e47c28d9a..6049e77bbe1d 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
> @@ -127,6 +127,19 @@ void topology_clear_scale_freq_source(enum scale_freq_source source,
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(topology_clear_scale_freq_source);
>  
> +bool topology_is_scale_freq_source(enum scale_freq_source source, unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> +	struct scale_freq_data *sfd;
> +	bool ret;
> +
> +	rcu_read_lock_sched();
> +	sfd = rcu_dereference_sched(*per_cpu_ptr(&sft_data, cpu));
> +	ret = (sfd && sfd->source == source);
> +	rcu_read_unlock_sched();
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>  void topology_scale_freq_tick(void)
>  {
>  	struct scale_freq_data *sfd = rcu_dereference_sched(*this_cpu_ptr(&sft_data));
> diff --git a/include/linux/arch_topology.h b/include/linux/arch_topology.h
> index ebd7f8935f96..fb7c1fe74808 100644
> --- a/include/linux/arch_topology.h
> +++ b/include/linux/arch_topology.h
> @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ struct scale_freq_data {
>  void topology_scale_freq_tick(void);
>  void topology_set_scale_freq_source(struct scale_freq_data *data, const struct cpumask *cpus);
>  void topology_clear_scale_freq_source(enum scale_freq_source source, const struct cpumask *cpus);
> +bool topology_is_scale_freq_source(enum scale_freq_source source, unsigned int cpu);
>  
>  DECLARE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, hw_pressure);
>  
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-11 10:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-11  7:28 [PATCH v3] arm64: topology: add source check in arch_cpu_idle_enter() Sean Wang
2026-08-11 10:02 ` Beata Michalska [this message]
2026-08-12  7:34   ` [External] " Sean Wang1
2026-08-12 11:02     ` Beata Michalska

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=anrzT-ez3b7uYaCt@arm.com \
    --to=beata.michalska@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=cuiyunhui@bytedance.com \
    --cc=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=driver-core@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=seanwang1@lenovo.com \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@kernel.org \
    --cc=sumitg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=xuewen.yan@unisoc.com \
    --cc=zhenglifeng1@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox