The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
To: daan@amutable.com
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
	 Daan De Meyer <daan.j.demeyer@gmail.com>,
	Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org,  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	nbd@other.debian.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] nbd: drop stale partitions on NBD_CLEAR_SOCK
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2026 17:44:36 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <anwyEbZhRHgSAyqB@shinmob> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260806-b4-loop-nbd-stale-partitions-v1-2-67bb75a8d7be@amutable.com>

On Aug 06, 2026 / 12:36, Daan De Meyer via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Daan De Meyer <daan@amutable.com>
> 
> Commit 267ec4d7223a ("loop: fix partition scan race between udev and
> loop_reread_partitions()") stopped disk_force_media_change() from
> setting GD_NEED_PART_SCAN. Besides requesting a rescan, that bit was what
> removed stale partitions on the next open, as bdev_disk_changed() drops
> all partitions before it consults disk_has_partscan().
> 
> nbd_clear_sock_ioctl() relied on that. It zeroes the capacity through
> nbd_bdev_reset(), but nothing removes the partitions of the disconnected
> device anymore. With the default max_part=16 they linger until the next
> connect sets GD_NEED_PART_SCAN again. With max_part=0 nothing ever sets
> it, so they are never removed at all, even though nbd does not set
> GENHD_FL_NO_PART and partitions can therefore still be added with BLKPG.
> 
> Set GD_NEED_PART_SCAN in nbd_clear_sock_ioctl() so the partitions are
> dropped on the next open. Calling bdev_disk_changed() directly is not an
> option as it needs open_mutex, which nbd_open() acquires under
> config_lock.
> 
> Fixes: 267ec4d7223a ("loop: fix partition scan race between udev and loop_reread_partitions()")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Daan De Meyer <daan@amutable.com>

Daan provided another new, blktests test case to recreate the problem describe
above [*]. I confirmed that the test case failed on v7.2-rc7 kernel, and this
patch avoids the failure.

Tested-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>

[*] https://github.com/linux-blktests/blktests/pull/260

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-12  8:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-06 10:36 [PATCH 0/2] loop, nbd: drop partitions left behind by the GD_NEED_PART_SCAN removal Daan De Meyer via B4 Relay
2026-08-06 10:36 ` [PATCH 1/2] loop: drop stale partitions on LOOP_CHANGE_FD Daan De Meyer via B4 Relay
2026-08-12  8:10   ` Shin'ichiro Kawasaki
2026-08-12 13:33   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-08-06 10:36 ` [PATCH 2/2] nbd: drop stale partitions on NBD_CLEAR_SOCK Daan De Meyer via B4 Relay
2026-08-12  8:44   ` Shin'ichiro Kawasaki [this message]
2026-08-12 13:33   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-08-06 16:48 ` [PATCH 0/2] loop, nbd: drop partitions left behind by the GD_NEED_PART_SCAN removal Bart Van Assche
2026-08-12  9:51 ` Christian Brauner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=anwyEbZhRHgSAyqB@shinmob \
    --to=shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=daan.j.demeyer@gmail.com \
    --cc=daan@amutable.com \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nbd@other.debian.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox