From: Peter Rosin <peda@lysator.liu.se>
To: Ahmad Byagowi <ahmadexp@gmail.com>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/3] i2c: mux: Factor out channel node lookup
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2026 07:50:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ao0tGY0sCgxHq3mV@gryt> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ab51db7f1d0ca80b0aab631c3215594b6fa33e33.1787502619.git.ahmadexp@gmail.com>
Hi!
Den Sun, Aug 23, 2026 at 09:34:37AM -0700, skrev Ahmad Byagowi:
> Move the existing Device Tree channel-node lookup into a helper in
> preparation for using generic firmware-node operations.
>
> This is a pure refactoring with no functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ahmad Byagowi <ahmadexp@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/i2c/i2c-mux.c | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-mux.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-mux.c
> index 68a4c34b5987..a8b94b97a725 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-mux.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-mux.c
> @@ -264,6 +264,51 @@ static const struct i2c_lock_operations i2c_parent_lock_ops = {
> .unlock_bus = i2c_parent_unlock_bus,
> };
>
> +static struct device_node *
> +i2c_mux_get_channel_node(struct i2c_mux_core *muxc, u32 chan_id)
> +{
> + struct device_node *dev_node = muxc->dev->of_node;
> + struct device_node *mux_node, *child = NULL;
> + u32 reg;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!dev_node)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + if (muxc->arbitrator)
> + mux_node = of_get_child_by_name(dev_node, "i2c-arb");
> + else if (muxc->gate)
> + mux_node = of_get_child_by_name(dev_node, "i2c-gate");
> + else
> + mux_node = of_get_child_by_name(dev_node, "i2c-mux");
> +
> + if (mux_node) {
> + /* A "reg" property indicates an old-style DT entry */
> + if (!of_property_read_u32(mux_node, "reg", ®)) {
> + of_node_put(mux_node);
> + mux_node = NULL;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (!mux_node)
> + mux_node = of_node_get(dev_node);
> + else if (muxc->arbitrator || muxc->gate)
> + child = of_node_get(mux_node);
You can return early here with "return mux_node;" (which also
obviates the need for the above " = NULL"-initializer and the
below "if (!child)"-test).
Cheers,
Peter
> +
> + if (!child) {
> + for_each_child_of_node(mux_node, child) {
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(child, "reg", ®);
> + if (ret)
> + continue;
> + if (chan_id == reg)
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + of_node_put(mux_node);
> + return child;
> +}
> +
> int i2c_mux_add_adapter(struct i2c_mux_core *muxc,
> u32 force_nr, u32 chan_id)
> {
> @@ -327,44 +372,7 @@ int i2c_mux_add_adapter(struct i2c_mux_core *muxc,
> * Try to populate the mux adapter's of_node, expands to
> * nothing if !CONFIG_OF.
> */
> - if (muxc->dev->of_node) {
> - struct device_node *dev_node = muxc->dev->of_node;
> - struct device_node *mux_node, *child = NULL;
> - u32 reg;
> -
> - if (muxc->arbitrator)
> - mux_node = of_get_child_by_name(dev_node, "i2c-arb");
> - else if (muxc->gate)
> - mux_node = of_get_child_by_name(dev_node, "i2c-gate");
> - else
> - mux_node = of_get_child_by_name(dev_node, "i2c-mux");
> -
> - if (mux_node) {
> - /* A "reg" property indicates an old-style DT entry */
> - if (!of_property_read_u32(mux_node, "reg", ®)) {
> - of_node_put(mux_node);
> - mux_node = NULL;
> - }
> - }
> -
> - if (!mux_node)
> - mux_node = of_node_get(dev_node);
> - else if (muxc->arbitrator || muxc->gate)
> - child = of_node_get(mux_node);
> -
> - if (!child) {
> - for_each_child_of_node(mux_node, child) {
> - ret = of_property_read_u32(child, "reg", ®);
> - if (ret)
> - continue;
> - if (chan_id == reg)
> - break;
> - }
> - }
> -
> - priv->adap.dev.of_node = child;
> - of_node_put(mux_node);
> - }
> + priv->adap.dev.of_node = i2c_mux_get_channel_node(muxc, chan_id);
>
> /*
> * Associate the mux channel with an ACPI node.
> --
> 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-25 5:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-23 16:34 [PATCH v7 0/3] i2c: mux: Propagate software nodes to channel adapters Ahmad Byagowi
2026-08-23 16:34 ` [PATCH v7 1/3] i2c: mux: Fix channel node leak on adapter add failure Ahmad Byagowi
2026-08-25 5:49 ` Peter Rosin
2026-08-23 16:34 ` [PATCH v7 2/3] i2c: mux: Factor out channel node lookup Ahmad Byagowi
2026-08-25 5:50 ` Peter Rosin [this message]
2026-08-23 16:34 ` [PATCH v7 3/3] i2c: mux: Propagate software nodes to channel adapters Ahmad Byagowi
2026-08-25 5:50 ` Peter Rosin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ao0tGY0sCgxHq3mV@gryt \
--to=peda@lysator.liu.se \
--cc=ahmadexp@gmail.com \
--cc=andi.shyti@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox