From: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Frederick Lawler <fred@cloudflare.com>,
Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@kernel.org>,
Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>,
Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com>,
Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@oracle.com>,
Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@cloudflare.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] configfs: move CONFIGFS_MAGIC definition to magic.h
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2026 01:07:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ao6ejs3oWcRAea4h@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46bde670fa25f07cc99dddc61ecc6de4d0ee125e.camel@linux.ibm.com>
On Tue, Aug 25, 2026 at 01:49:53PM -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> On Tue, 2026-08-25 at 11:47 -0500, Frederick Lawler wrote:
> > Hi Breno,
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 25, 2026 at 07:10:02AM -0700, Breno Leitao wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2026 at 06:45:22PM -0500, Frederick Lawler wrote:
> > > > IMA shouldn't measure or appraise configfs, but currently does because
> > > > it's missing from the default exclusion policies. Move CONFIGFS_MAGIC to
> > > > magic.h to expose the file system's magic to IMA, as well as other userland
> > > > applications.
> > > >
> > > > Suggested-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Frederick Lawler <fred@cloudflare.com>
> > >
> > > Do you want this change to go thorugh the configfs tree, or the tree
> > > specific for IMA?
> > > ?
> >
> > Unless you have a user asking for it, I personally think it makes sense
> > for linux-integrity to take it since the two patches are related.
> >
> > I don't mind spinning a v3 for integrity if you choose to take it now.
> >
> > Best,
> > Fred
> >
> > PS. Sorry for not keeping the Reviewed-by tag from v1. I usually
> > forget _something_ with re-spins until after the fact.
>
> Breno, thank you for the Reviewed-by. The patch set didn't quite make it in
> time for the open window, but I plan on upstreaming them. Can we change the
> Reviewed-by to an Acked-by?
Sure. Feel free to do it.
Acked-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-26 8:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-19 23:45 [PATCH v2 0/2] ima: don't measure/appraise files on configfs Frederick Lawler
2026-08-19 23:45 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] configfs: move CONFIGFS_MAGIC definition to magic.h Frederick Lawler
2026-08-25 14:10 ` Breno Leitao
2026-08-25 16:47 ` Frederick Lawler
2026-08-25 17:49 ` Mimi Zohar
2026-08-26 8:07 ` Breno Leitao [this message]
2026-08-19 23:45 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] ima: don't measure/appraise files on configfs Frederick Lawler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ao6ejs3oWcRAea4h@gmail.com \
--to=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=a.hindborg@kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com \
--cc=eric.snowberg@oracle.com \
--cc=fred@cloudflare.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=kernel-team@cloudflare.com \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox