From: Pranjal Shrivastava <praan@google.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: Dmitry Malkin <dma@nebius.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
"iommu@lists.linux.dev" <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"regressions@lists.linux.dev" <regressions@lists.linux.dev>,
"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
NB-Core Team <NB-CoreTeam@nebius.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Allow nested attach for PCI bridges without vDEVICE
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2026 12:53:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aoMEUDQKlaWzvE8n@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260817114407.GB1175472@nvidia.com>
On Mon, Aug 17, 2026 at 08:44:07AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2026 at 11:16:17AM +0000, Pranjal Shrivastava wrote:
> > But, regarding PCI P2PDMA, you can still enable it with ACS enabled in
> > the upstream kernel *IF* your hardware supports TLP forwarding between
> > root ports.
> >
> > When ACS is enabled, all TLPs get forwarded to the host's Root Ports
> > instead of getting routed directly through the switch.
>
> Generally nobody wants to run like that, the performance is
> terrible. The reason these systems have a PCI switch is because of
> performance of the P2P path.
Ack. I was assuming the enablement was the major challenge. For perf we
definitly need to hairpin at the switch.
>
> Jason
Thanks,
Praan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-17 12:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-14 10:07 [RFC PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Allow nested attach for PCI bridges without vDEVICE Dmitry Malkin
2026-08-14 14:15 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-08-14 15:40 ` Dmitry Malkin
2026-08-14 17:49 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-08-14 17:48 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-08-14 18:56 ` Dmitry Malkin
2026-08-14 22:11 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-08-17 9:29 ` Dmitry Malkin
2026-08-17 11:16 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-08-17 11:44 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-08-17 12:53 ` Pranjal Shrivastava [this message]
2026-08-17 11:41 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-08-17 14:26 ` Dmitry Malkin
2026-08-17 15:20 ` Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aoMEUDQKlaWzvE8n@google.com \
--to=praan@google.com \
--cc=NB-CoreTeam@nebius.com \
--cc=dma@nebius.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox