From: Boqun Feng <boqun@kernel.org>
To: Radu Rendec <radu@rendec.net>
Cc: Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw@gmail.com>,
tglx@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, lyude@redhat.com,
jserv@ccns.ncku.edu.tw, marscheng@google.com,
eleanor15x@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irq: Make refcount_interrupt kunit test selectable
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2026 14:08:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aothV3LBc84YJd88@tardis.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <014ccedef7256efc027b8759134b9d1712d3afb6.camel@rendec.net>
On Sun, Aug 23, 2026 at 04:46:23PM -0400, Radu Rendec wrote:
> On Sun, 2026-08-23 at 17:17 +0000, Kuan-Wei Chiu wrote:
> > Currently, refcount_interrupt_test is built unconditionally when
> > CONFIG_KUNIT is enabled, causing it to run unexpectedly during boot.
> >
> > Fix this by introducing CONFIG_REFCOUNT_INTERRUPT_KUNIT_TEST so the
> > test can be configured independently, following standard kunit
> > practices.
> >
> > Fixes: 07a88e2bcd5b ("irq: Add KUnit test for refcounted interrupt enable/disable")
> > Signed-off-by: Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > kernel/irq/Kconfig | 12 ++++++++++++
> > kernel/irq/Makefile | 2 +-
> > 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Can someone please explain me why this needs to be a separate unit test
> in the first place and can't be integrated into the (previously)
> existing unit test gated by IRQ_KUNIT_TEST?
>
If you look at the irq_test.c, you will find that it primarily tests the
{request,disable,enable}_irq() API (i.e. allocating IRQ vectors and
enabling and disabling them), which is not the same scope as
local_interrupt_{disable,enable}() (i.e. operating the CPU irq disabling
status), so it makes sense to have a separate test case.
But yes, I agree Kuan-Wei's fix is needed.
Regards,
Boqun
> Ironically, both the issue that this patch is trying to fix and my
> question were raised by sashiko here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260605055315.3E96E1F00893@smtp.kernel.org/
>
> > diff --git a/kernel/irq/Kconfig b/kernel/irq/Kconfig
> > index 05cba4e16dad..6923f37eaab4 100644
> > --- a/kernel/irq/Kconfig
> > +++ b/kernel/irq/Kconfig
> > @@ -150,6 +150,18 @@ config IRQ_KUNIT_TEST
> >
> > If unsure, say N.
> >
> > +config REFCOUNT_INTERRUPT_KUNIT_TEST
> > + tristate "Test refcounted interrupt enable/disable" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
> > + depends on KUNIT
> > + default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
> > + help
> > + This builds the kunit tests for the refcounted interrupt
> > + infrastructure. It verifies the correctness of single, nested,
> > + and multiple interrupt enable/disable state changes and ensures
> > + that the underlying reference counting mechanisms work as expected.
> > +
> > + If unsure, say N.
> > +
> > endmenu
> >
> > config GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER
> > diff --git a/kernel/irq/Makefile b/kernel/irq/Makefile
> > index 44c4d6fc502a..0e5df962a149 100644
> > --- a/kernel/irq/Makefile
> > +++ b/kernel/irq/Makefile
> > @@ -16,4 +16,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += affinity.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_IRQ_DEBUGFS) += debugfs.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_IRQ_MATRIX_ALLOCATOR) += matrix.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_IRQ_KUNIT_TEST) += irq_test.o
> > -obj-$(CONFIG_KUNIT) += refcount_interrupt_test.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_REFCOUNT_INTERRUPT_KUNIT_TEST) += refcount_interrupt_test.o
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-23 21:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-23 17:17 [PATCH] irq: Make refcount_interrupt kunit test selectable Kuan-Wei Chiu
2026-08-23 20:46 ` Radu Rendec
2026-08-23 21:08 ` Boqun Feng [this message]
2026-08-23 21:52 ` Radu Rendec
2026-08-24 5:23 ` Boqun Feng
2026-08-24 15:02 ` Radu Rendec
2026-08-25 14:09 ` Boqun Feng
2026-08-23 21:10 ` Boqun Feng
2026-08-24 15:14 ` Radu Rendec
2026-08-25 20:11 ` lyude
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aothV3LBc84YJd88@tardis.local \
--to=boqun@kernel.org \
--cc=eleanor15x@gmail.com \
--cc=jserv@ccns.ncku.edu.tw \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lyude@redhat.com \
--cc=marscheng@google.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=radu@rendec.net \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=visitorckw@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox