From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ej1-f46.google.com (mail-ej1-f46.google.com [209.85.218.46]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9E7941E6D6 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2026 13:01:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.218.46 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787576489; cv=none; b=ZVkdjqB30cAweBYlSXTmJW+b0xOZy7iXfsV0W+SdyqTkXStgqjIox22nM6n+7iuSgm0fr1pjbWVyOef6BsGXFbta1ET5ygFvsxS4qWUkvHXzLZXtJhKPelufrju4cjSxiGJhuFtNHlAfBYR79638XOnJgESbf8qukZSAsm236i0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787576489; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ehxKGCl2X5B/1IOEDTS8ANSWyiXGlGGYkVM+GEl+HLo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Axwd3bmhxTh6y4G47itTmQlZ3KvrnNlLN44pAM5wD0gx/AxtdB4iawwi37deTS98txdv6+YPVhHI1Wpfb2IE5INV1h6K0byIOAOUlfdUTXaoaWwoe9yc6HcOszUvNYy6y+lGAKkg7a2/pGOaKM81LGibnJJZw/943+XQV+F4024= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=suse.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=suse.com header.i=@suse.com header.b=PPdsAzEP; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.218.46 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=suse.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=suse.com header.i=@suse.com header.b="PPdsAzEP" Received: by mail-ej1-f46.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-c167aa9500dso515273966b.3 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2026 06:01:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=google; t=1787576486; x=1788181286; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:content-type:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=Pt4qchYiVKMNGY6XXirkSLkRJOx81JgmCbFLO8XAS28=; b=PPdsAzEP3WR9fvnlFoRlYtxYSiDozQMMHC4ZXgewlGOcwDFeQ645JfMX7C42tRY/49 6gIN4/uDQmWmZIbslqJEpVZarkog0pIMOSSPoXTaJuSSIAk4AWikZFmrYQ++1xoptHy3 sZN55sbNhSpwRjTWxv6oFT9KRHNX8xE1SON7ZHr4rxpG9cJNMY/z65a20aLOgd6vWJIk rloEXodPJDiav2FDGESPTM7wsewJ02nqq8PnbqhyRjv2gg6ylI1hiOGie3a1siFsCIDk cGtfDbUX/v2rjd/DmXcIcYy7/9vfbOqsu7Yvb35OD0bCR5HK7YgdvnpYJS4Yq+NSgiwa sGvg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1787576486; x=1788181286; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:content-type:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to :content-type; bh=Pt4qchYiVKMNGY6XXirkSLkRJOx81JgmCbFLO8XAS28=; b=T/tg3k0EOl8AVoDde6qgcw7VXgVYIgoKcHYTKLpdiaI/l0O5UfiK42RgfUGbIbPwG3 l5iZj2mqPDdbv0mBUiZdksHOmA2SFlobWhuBS4t/eZ/TIIXT7A+HkMtpvrfRAtdnDGiw xFJ99uZmNCXT0PItJYDPOt1gK1Sz9DBplFMT/LRrbD9r3MdIJvhrjFD8Z8H7p2o2951B YmxJDqFdS9cpCrtjwbVKZoPZoaCnEjp3rkn+3eik9YG48o/AqKtBBG6QXzXwsCvC0rFG IvFIVC/n/z8jSVPrp+5z9RRZE4tq0OrcrnWocoRfisDHa4VE5/zqu1nFViNJeQAkJRAn yJLw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AHgh+RoFRYizcH4udDKqLwnCv/CKOZLfRCAqjti8UREGEXfBSNaJ67UVV4wVSSP42Axw6zJplV6oYZZIZdrk9Dw=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AFuF++la87SWJ9tGJQPmoXI4YhcVY1u5MI7NkG1LaeqQYgPPxmQnO5oc i89cEOfDZKUMtYsS9OTxEN2GCmXfpYeTyEPMBeJaVbr54xqiqG+o2lEb4RyHmBCUnIvG8o3nlAE nwEhNJOY= X-Gm-Gg: AR+sD12MzLkNr8awzF++WpNy4RWT3ddDOgI2h/QDq3S2v0ayGmcM4PZx87xA/p7LZ6B 18lkCQ6+8qjHrre+3n+y24W78rCFJIqhmW/vJFwPjTnBQe55sU364JhtN6H4uIzxk7dB2xTpyew 6kzcVdbwfh0uF7RFvMt6b2K8oLWT7Phuf1J9j4xRzCIfNX33L80SMnAvbvf5yazSqXOJbEYyiiE JAVXPJNig1Tl8wEANMS9oFVHdNeokO+JLw0nDBaMAQVLskxirpr7E4/Q8nbvCQHq9msFF2eHk3Q oyoT7CCHwWYHI7McdwuSRCWsEm4qgHheLPamajehETpsUt8Xthv9Gg6ZDStWzNw8APdZA1FvX3W q76LCYQjTXsUNsCySbCcTgUGA+RRpR9NtOggVx3H+APGt6CuLp9JRYg4KYM0A3TQGrnUZHQQiwW cowLLwzbSQ9ZR/ivzzF3hovVC9c6NbDIS/a/TUdGUIbgjlie36r0sYQxShSTOs9tR9kAQ/sO5ZK Q== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:930a:b0:c1c:6f0d:5b22 with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-c246a654342mr3127903466b.11.1787576485993; Mon, 24 Aug 2026 06:01:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (109-81-81-112.rct.o2.cz. [109.81.81.112]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a640c23a62f3a-c249672becesm1294715466b.42.2026.08.24.06.01.24 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 24 Aug 2026 06:01:25 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2026 15:01:23 +0200 From: Michal Hocko To: Jiayuan Chen Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, Emil Tsalapatis , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , John Fastabend , Andrii Nakryiko , Eduard Zingerman , Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi , Martin KaFai Lau , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , Jiri Olsa , Ihor Solodrai , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Clark Williams , Steven Rostedt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/4] bpf: Add a sleepable page allocator for map memory Message-ID: References: <20260821050250.35112-1-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev> <20260821050631.39784-1-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Mon 24-08-26 20:44:18, Jiayuan Chen wrote: > > On 8/24/26 8:26 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Fri 21-08-26 13:06:12, Jiayuan Chen wrote: > > > bpf_map_alloc_pages() picks the allocator via can_alloc_pages(), a > > > conservative guess for BPF program context that is always false under > > > PREEMPT_RT. So even a caller that really is sleepable gets the > > > non-blocking allocator, which never reclaims and never engages the OOM > > > machinery. > > I thought one of the main motivations was reentrancy. As you cannot > > really assume the context bpf_map_alloc_pages is called from there is an > > extra care needed so that this doesn't re-enter the allocator from bpf > > program called from allocator path and deadlock. > > > Agreed, bpf_map_alloc_pages() is designed to be safe to run in any context. > > The commit message should be precise. How do you achive any level of safety for the _sleepable version? Vast majority of the kernel is sleepable but that doesn't mean this is safe from the mm reentrancy POV. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs