From: Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw@gmail.com>
To: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de>,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] verification/rvgen: Use .old instead of .bak for kunit backup files
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2026 23:33:13 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aoxkOQ_P4CYWaKiw@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260824081519.81103-2-gmonaco@redhat.com>
On Mon, Aug 24, 2026 at 10:15:19AM +0200, Gabriele Monaco wrote:
> The rvgen kunit command generates .bak backup files and these can be
> checked in for selftests (make check). Clean targets like make disclean
> remove such files, leaving the tree dirty.
>
> Switch to .old to preserve a clean tree after make disclean.
>
> Reported-by: Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw@gmail.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/aosuwKH5GOEo0xTN@google.com
> Fixes: 7b6246294eb0 ("verification/rvgen: Add selftests for rvgen kunit")
> Signed-off-by: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@redhat.com>
Thanks for the quick fix!
The working tree now remains clean after running make distclean.
Tested-by: Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw@gmail.com>
Regards,
Kuan-Wei
> ---
> tools/verification/rvgen/rvgen/kunit.py | 2 +-
> .../{test_bak_kunit_kunit.c.bak => test_bak_kunit_kunit.c.old} | 0
> 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> rename tools/verification/rvgen/tests/golden/test_bak_kunit/{test_bak_kunit_kunit.c.bak => test_bak_kunit_kunit.c.old} (100%)
>
> diff --git a/tools/verification/rvgen/rvgen/kunit.py b/tools/verification/rvgen/rvgen/kunit.py
> index ed2082d7d3bc..85973f918c9b 100644
> --- a/tools/verification/rvgen/rvgen/kunit.py
> +++ b/tools/verification/rvgen/rvgen/kunit.py
> @@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT({struct_name});
> for path in (header_file_path, kunit_c_file_path):
> if path.exists():
> try:
> - path.rename(path.with_suffix(path.suffix + ".bak"))
> + path.rename(path.with_suffix(path.suffix + ".old"))
> except OSError as e:
> raise KUnitError(f"Error backing up file {path}: {e}") from e
>
> diff --git a/tools/verification/rvgen/tests/golden/test_bak_kunit/test_bak_kunit_kunit.c.bak b/tools/verification/rvgen/tests/golden/test_bak_kunit/test_bak_kunit_kunit.c.old
> similarity index 100%
> rename from tools/verification/rvgen/tests/golden/test_bak_kunit/test_bak_kunit_kunit.c.bak
> rename to tools/verification/rvgen/tests/golden/test_bak_kunit/test_bak_kunit_kunit.c.old
>
> base-commit: 0a0d1d55dad570724bf8c7ea83409639cfb4be9b
> --
> 2.55.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-24 15:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-24 8:15 [PATCH] verification/rvgen: Use .old instead of .bak for kunit backup files Gabriele Monaco
2026-08-24 15:33 ` Kuan-Wei Chiu [this message]
2026-08-25 6:49 ` Nam Cao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aoxkOQ_P4CYWaKiw@google.com \
--to=visitorckw@gmail.com \
--cc=gmonaco@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=namcao@linutronix.de \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox