From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Large block device patch, part 1 of 9
Date: 2 Dec 2002 16:05:17 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <asgsft$p0e$1@cesium.transmeta.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: E17mJZh-0005jw-00@starship
Followup to: <E17mJZh-0005jw-00@starship>
By author: Daniel Phillips <phillips@arcor.de>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> We've been through this before. Last time, the winning solution was:
>
> printk("at least %lli of your u64s are belong to us\n", (long long) sect_num);
>
> and I expect it will be this time too. It's just a printk! Who cares if it
> wastes a few bytes. It's even conceivable that if we use this idiom heavily
> enough, some gcc boffin will take the time to optimize away the useless
> conversions.
>
Why can't we use the C99 standard:
printk("at least %ji of your u64s are belong to us\n", (uintmax_t) sect_num);
I, for one, would be rather happy at having <inttypes.h> available in
the kernel, as either an alternative or instead of the [su]XX/__[su]XX types.
-hpa
--
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt <amsp@zytor.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-02 23:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-08-23 5:47 Large block device patch, part 1 of 9 Peter Chubb
2002-08-23 7:07 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-08-27 15:23 ` Pavel Machek
2002-08-27 22:58 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-08-27 23:40 ` Peter Chubb
2002-09-03 10:01 ` Neil Brown
2002-09-03 16:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-09-03 16:21 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-09-03 23:06 ` Neil Brown
2002-12-03 0:03 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-09-03 19:42 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-03 19:50 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-09-03 20:02 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-03 20:04 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-09-03 20:19 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-03 20:25 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-03 20:05 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-09-03 20:19 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-12-03 0:05 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
[not found] <15732.34929.657481.777572@notabene.cse.unsw.edu.au.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.44.0209030900410.1997-100000@home.transmeta.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2002-09-03 16:23 ` Andi Kleen
2002-09-03 8:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-09-03 16:43 ` Nikita Danilov
2002-09-03 8:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-12-03 0:06 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-12-05 10:58 ` Pavel Machek
2002-12-05 21:15 ` H. Peter Anvin
[not found] <825516963@toto.iv>
[not found] ` <15734.37217.686498.162782@wombat.chubb.wattle.id.au>
2002-09-05 0:04 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-09-05 0:38 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-05 1:31 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-09-05 4:05 ` Daniel Phillips
[not found] <fa.l4d1mqv.1ghm1h2@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.j8nq6dv.14lihor@ifi.uio.no>
2002-12-03 8:45 ` Giacomo Catenazzi
2002-12-03 17:40 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-12-03 17:48 ` Giacomo Catenazzi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='asgsft$p0e$1@cesium.transmeta.com' \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).