From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>
To: Ethan Ferguson <ethanf108@gmail.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: remove CONFIG_NETDEVICES requirement for SO_BINDTODEVICE and SO_BINDTOIFINDEX
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2026 06:25:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <avf-PdwTjpqN7d0D@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261110204524.82341-1-ethanf108@gmail.com>
On Tue, 10 Nov 2026 15:45:24 -0500, Ethan Ferguson wrote:
> The SO_BINDTODEVICE and SO_BINDTOIFINDEX sockopts return -ENOPROTOOPT
> if CONFIG_NETDEVICES is disabled, even if the lo interface exists. I
> believe it would be prudent to allow for valid bindings even if
> CONFIG_NETDEVICES were disabled, as an error here would be inconsistent.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ethan Ferguson <ethanf108@gmail.com>
>
> ---
> net/core/sock.c | 56 +++++++++++++------------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
> index e8551df8330f..d2da59700ecf 100644
> --- a/net/core/sock.c
> +++ b/net/core/sock.c
> @@ -634,18 +634,14 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(sk_dst_check);
>
> static int sock_bindtoindex_locked(struct sock *sk, int ifindex)
> {
> - int ret = -ENOPROTOOPT;
> -#ifdef CONFIG_NETDEVICES
> struct net *net = sock_net(sk);
>
> /* Sorry... */
> - ret = -EPERM;
> if (sk->sk_bound_dev_if && !ns_capable(net->user_ns, CAP_NET_RAW))
> - goto out;
> + return -EPERM;
>
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> if (ifindex < 0)
> - goto out;
> + return -EINVAL;
>
> /* Paired with all READ_ONCE() done locklessly. */
> WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_bound_dev_if, ifindex);
> @@ -654,12 +650,7 @@ static int sock_bindtoindex_locked(struct sock *sk, int ifindex)
> sk->sk_prot->rehash(sk);
> sk_dst_reset(sk);
>
> - ret = 0;
> -
> -out:
> -#endif
> -
> - return ret;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> int sock_bindtoindex(struct sock *sk, int ifindex, bool lock_sk)
> @@ -678,15 +669,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(sock_bindtoindex);
>
> static int sock_setbindtodevice(struct sock *sk, sockptr_t optval, int optlen)
> {
> - int ret = -ENOPROTOOPT;
> -#ifdef CONFIG_NETDEVICES
> + int ret, index;
> struct net *net = sock_net(sk);
> char devname[IFNAMSIZ];
> - int index;
nit: keep the reverse xmas tree order.
Also, please specify the target tree in the Subject.
[PATCH net-next v2] ....
See Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst
---
pw-bot: cr
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-14 6:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-10 20:45 [PATCH] net: remove CONFIG_NETDEVICES requirement for SO_BINDTODEVICE and SO_BINDTOIFINDEX Ethan Ferguson
2026-11-14 6:25 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=avf-PdwTjpqN7d0D@google.com \
--to=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=ethanf108@gmail.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox