From: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, eranian@google.com, tj@kernel.org,
ak@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] perf: Add filter_match() as a parameter for pinned/flexible_sched_in()
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 11:31:26 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b00952cd-9af1-3e4f-45cb-11a692e9b722@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190429151225.GC2182@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com>
On 4/29/2019 11:12 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 07:44:03AM -0700, kan.liang@linux.intel.com wrote:
>> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
>>
>> A fast path will be introduced in the following patches to speed up the
>> cgroup events sched in, which only needs a simpler filter_match().
>>
>> Add filter_match() as a parameter for pinned/flexible_sched_in().
>>
>> No functional change.
>
> I suspect that the cost you're trying to avoid is pmu_filter_match()
> iterating over the entire group, which arm systems rely upon for correct
> behaviour on big.LITTLE systems.
>
> Is that the case?
No. In X86, we don't use pmu_filter_match(). The fast path still keeps
this filter.
perf_cgroup_match() is the one I want to avoid.
Thanks,
Kan
>
> Thanks,
> Mark.
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> kernel/events/core.c | 15 +++++++++------
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
>> index 388dd42..782fd86 100644
>> --- a/kernel/events/core.c
>> +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
>> @@ -3251,7 +3251,8 @@ static void cpu_ctx_sched_out(struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx,
>> }
>>
>> static int visit_groups_merge(struct perf_event_groups *groups, int cpu,
>> - int (*func)(struct perf_event *, void *), void *data)
>> + int (*func)(struct perf_event *, void *, int (*)(struct perf_event *)),
>> + void *data)
>> {
>> struct perf_event **evt, *evt1, *evt2;
>> int ret;
>> @@ -3271,7 +3272,7 @@ static int visit_groups_merge(struct perf_event_groups *groups, int cpu,
>> evt = &evt2;
>> }
>>
>> - ret = func(*evt, data);
>> + ret = func(*evt, data, event_filter_match);
>> if (ret)
>> return ret;
>>
>> @@ -3287,7 +3288,8 @@ struct sched_in_data {
>> int can_add_hw;
>> };
>>
>> -static int pinned_sched_in(struct perf_event *event, void *data)
>> +static int pinned_sched_in(struct perf_event *event, void *data,
>> + int (*filter_match)(struct perf_event *))
>> {
>> struct sched_in_data *sid = data;
>>
>> @@ -3300,7 +3302,7 @@ static int pinned_sched_in(struct perf_event *event, void *data)
>> return 0;
>> #endif
>>
>> - if (!event_filter_match(event))
>> + if (!filter_match(event))
>> return 0;
>>
>> if (group_can_go_on(event, sid->cpuctx, sid->can_add_hw)) {
>> @@ -3318,7 +3320,8 @@ static int pinned_sched_in(struct perf_event *event, void *data)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> -static int flexible_sched_in(struct perf_event *event, void *data)
>> +static int flexible_sched_in(struct perf_event *event, void *data,
>> + int (*filter_match)(struct perf_event *))
>> {
>> struct sched_in_data *sid = data;
>>
>> @@ -3331,7 +3334,7 @@ static int flexible_sched_in(struct perf_event *event, void *data)
>> return 0;
>> #endif
>>
>> - if (!event_filter_match(event))
>> + if (!filter_match(event))
>> return 0;
>>
>> if (group_can_go_on(event, sid->cpuctx, sid->can_add_hw)) {
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-29 15:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-29 14:44 [PATCH 0/4] Optimize cgroup context switch kan.liang
2019-04-29 14:44 ` [PATCH 1/4] perf: Fix system-wide events miscounting during cgroup monitoring kan.liang
2019-04-29 15:04 ` Mark Rutland
2019-04-29 15:27 ` Liang, Kan
2019-04-30 8:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-30 15:45 ` Liang, Kan
2019-04-29 14:44 ` [PATCH 2/4] perf: Add filter_match() as a parameter for pinned/flexible_sched_in() kan.liang
2019-04-29 15:12 ` Mark Rutland
2019-04-29 15:31 ` Liang, Kan [this message]
2019-04-29 16:56 ` Mark Rutland
2019-04-29 14:44 ` [PATCH 3/4] perf cgroup: Add cgroup ID as a key of RB tree kan.liang
2019-04-29 23:02 ` Ian Rogers
2019-04-30 9:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-30 15:46 ` Liang, Kan
2019-04-30 9:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-30 15:46 ` Liang, Kan
2019-04-30 9:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-29 14:44 ` [PATCH 4/4] perf cgroup: Add fast path for cgroup switch kan.liang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b00952cd-9af1-3e4f-45cb-11a692e9b722@linux.intel.com \
--to=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox