From: neil.armstrong@linaro.org
To: Nick Xie <xieqinick@gmail.com>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: khilman@baylibre.com, jbrunet@baylibre.com,
martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, xianwei.zhao@amlogic.com,
christianshewitt@gmail.com, krzk+dt@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org,
conor+dt@kernel.org, nick@khadas.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: amlogic: add Khadas VIM1S binding
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2026 13:07:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b017db65-54c2-473c-8263-4fecfbf9a330@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP4nuTX556F6a+aMndYayu-29u-SsYi0g0ie8ONz8b5GStgv-g@mail.gmail.com>
On 1/14/26 12:25, Nick Xie wrote:
> Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> 于2026年1月14日周三 18:33写道:
>>
>> On 14/01/2026 11:07, Nick Xie wrote:
>>> Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> 于2026年1月14日周三 16:51写道:
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 02:25:48PM +0800, Nick Xie wrote:
>>>>> Add devicetree binding for Khadas VIM1S board based on
>>>>> Amlogic S4 S905Y4 SoC.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Nick Xie <nick@khadas.com>
>>>>
>>>> You still have the same From/SoB mismatch.
>>>
>>> OK, I will fix it in next version.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/amlogic.yaml | 6 ++++++
>>>>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/amlogic.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/amlogic.yaml
>>>>> index 08d9963fe9259..55663e0f7f915 100644
>>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/amlogic.yaml
>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/amlogic.yaml
>>>>> @@ -247,6 +247,12 @@ properties:
>>>>> - amlogic,aq222
>>>>> - const: amlogic,s4
>>
>> Look here
>>
>>>>>
>>>>> + - description: Boards with the Amlogic Meson S4 S905Y4 SoC
>>>>> + items:
>>>>> + - enum:
>>>>
>>>> Yopu already have exactly such enum with such description, so your
>>>> compatible goes there. Look - it is called "Boards" - plural.
>>>
>>> The exist board aq222 is based on SoC S905X2, but the new board vim1s
>>> is baed on S905Y4,
>>> they are different SoC, so we need to put S905Y4 under S805X2 ?
>>
>> What is the point of having two separate lists with enums ending the
>> same SoC compatible?
>
> Actually S805X2 and S905Y4 are different SoC. So maybe like this ?
>
> S805X2:
> - description: Boards with the Amlogic Meson S4 S805X2 SoC
> items:
> - enum:
> - amlogic,aq222
> - const: amlogic,s805x2
> - const: amlogic,s4
>
> S905Y4:
> - description: Boards with the Amlogic Meson S4 S905Y4 SoC
> items:
> - enum:
> - khadas,vim1s
> - const: amlogic,s905y4
> - const: amlogic,s4
It's ok for me, but you'll need to update the aq222 DT aswell.
>
> Same as Amlogic A311D & S922X
>
> S922X:
> - const: amlogic,s922x
> - const: amlogic,g12b
>
> A311D:
> - const: amlogic,a311d
> - const: amlogic,g12b
>
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> + - khadas,vim1s
>>>>> + - const: amlogic,s4
>>
>> And here.
>>
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Krzysztof
>>>>
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-14 12:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-14 6:25 [PATCH v2 0/2] arm64: dts: meson-s4: add support for Khadas VIM1S Nick Xie
2026-01-14 6:25 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: amlogic: add Khadas VIM1S binding Nick Xie
2026-01-14 8:51 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-01-14 10:07 ` Nick Xie
2026-01-14 10:13 ` neil.armstrong
2026-01-14 10:33 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-01-14 11:25 ` Nick Xie
2026-01-14 12:07 ` neil.armstrong [this message]
2026-01-14 12:06 ` neil.armstrong
2026-01-14 6:25 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: dts: add initial device-tree for Khadas VIM1S Nick Xie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b017db65-54c2-473c-8263-4fecfbf9a330@linaro.org \
--to=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=christianshewitt@gmail.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jbrunet@baylibre.com \
--cc=khilman@baylibre.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com \
--cc=nick@khadas.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=xianwei.zhao@amlogic.com \
--cc=xieqinick@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox