From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/fpu: don't set TIF_NEED_FPU_LOAD for PF_IO_WORKER threads
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2023 09:06:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b03383e3-cb10-8b70-a042-dbc2170ee3ec@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y8/8CFwtpmjzdK9c@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On 1/24/23 8:40 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 08:23:20AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> We don't set it on PF_KTHREAD threads as they never return to userspace,
>> and PF_IO_WORKER threads are identical in that regard. As they keep
>> running in the kernel until they die, skip setting the FPU flag on them.
>
> No objection to the actual patch; but this changelog fails to tell us
> why this is important.
>
> What made you get up and write this patch :-) Presumably this is a
> performance issue? If so, can you quantify how much?
You snipped the part where that was explained, but arguably that should
probably go into the commit message itself:
"Not urgent, more of a cosmetic thing that was found while debugging and
issue and pondering why the FPU flag is set on these threads."
So it's not really a performance issue, it was just something odd that
got me scratching my head when debugging another issue and poking at
the flags.
Want a resend of it, or will you just augment the commit message?
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-24 16:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-24 15:23 [PATCH] x86/fpu: don't set TIF_NEED_FPU_LOAD for PF_IO_WORKER threads Jens Axboe
2023-01-24 15:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-01-24 16:06 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2023-01-24 16:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-01-24 16:42 ` Jens Axboe
2023-01-25 11:39 ` [tip: x86/fpu] x86/fpu: Don't " tip-bot2 for Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b03383e3-cb10-8b70-a042-dbc2170ee3ec@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox