From: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
To: "Karan Tilak Kumar (kartilak)" <kartilak@cisco.com>,
"Sesidhar Baddela (sebaddel)" <sebaddel@cisco.com>
Cc: "Arulprabhu Ponnusamy (arulponn)" <arulponn@cisco.com>,
"Dhanraj Jhawar (djhawar)" <djhawar@cisco.com>,
"Gian Carlo Boffa (gcboffa)" <gcboffa@cisco.com>,
"Masa Kai (mkai2)" <mkai2@cisco.com>,
"Satish Kharat (satishkh)" <satishkh@cisco.com>,
"jejb@linux.ibm.com" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
"martin.petersen@oracle.com" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 10/13] scsi: fnic: Add support for multiqueue (MQ) in fnic_main.c
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2023 16:32:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b0552a30-c94b-4877-890f-d3f5bbdeaebd@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SJ0PR11MB5896F9B7FA37D78B91BB1D42C3B1A@SJ0PR11MB5896.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On 15/11/2023 23:20, Karan Tilak Kumar (kartilak) wrote:
>>> +
>>> + if (intr_mode == VNIC_DEV_INTR_MODE_MSI || intr_mode == VNIC_DEV_INTR_MODE_INTX) {
>>> + FNIC_MAIN_DBG(KERN_ERR, fnic->lport->host, fnic->fnic_num,
>>> + "intr_mode is not msix\n");
>> Are these checks just paranoia? I mean that it is strange to have
>> fnic_mq_map_queues_cpus() called but not be required to do anything.
>>
> Unified Computing Servers Management (UCSM) is a GUI tool to configure Cisco Servers.
> There are interrupt options that can be modified to INTX or MSI or MSI-x.
> All these options are still supported.
>
> However, we do not support multiqueue (MQ) on MSI or INTX.
By this I assume it means nr_hw_queues = 1 for MSI or INTX
> These checks are present to only prevent an MQ "misconfiguration".
If you check blk_mq_update_queue_map(), for set->ops->map_queues unset
we call blk_mq_map_queues() - I am just wondering what does the
equivalent to blk_mq_map_queues() for you in these other modes.
I am concerned that it is not proper that we have a set->ops->map_queues
method, but it does nothing in some scenarios.
Thanks,
John
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-16 16:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-14 22:38 [PATCH v3 10/13] scsi: fnic: Add support for multiqueue (MQ) in fnic_main.c Karan Tilak Kumar
2023-11-15 15:03 ` John Garry
2023-11-15 23:20 ` Karan Tilak Kumar (kartilak)
2023-11-16 16:32 ` John Garry [this message]
2023-11-16 17:30 ` John Garry
2023-11-16 21:02 ` Karan Tilak Kumar (kartilak)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b0552a30-c94b-4877-890f-d3f5bbdeaebd@oracle.com \
--to=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=arulponn@cisco.com \
--cc=djhawar@cisco.com \
--cc=gcboffa@cisco.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kartilak@cisco.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=mkai2@cisco.com \
--cc=satishkh@cisco.com \
--cc=sebaddel@cisco.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox