Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm/show_mem: Dump the status of the mem alloc profiling before printing

[Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>]

On 03/09/2025 10:34, Yueyang Pan wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 03, 2025 at 11:26:01AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>> On 9/2/25 17:57, Yueyang Pan wrote:
>>> This patch prints the status of the memory allocation profiling
>>> before __show_mem actually prints the detailed allocation info.
>>> This way will let us know the `0B` we saw in allocation info is
>>> because the profiling is disabled or the allocation is actually
>>> 0B.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yueyang Pan <pyyjason@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>>  mm/show_mem.c | 2 ++
>>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/mm/show_mem.c b/mm/show_mem.c
>>> index ecf20a93ea54..51892ce2efc4 100644
>>> --- a/mm/show_mem.c
>>> +++ b/mm/show_mem.c
>>> @@ -427,6 +427,8 @@ void __show_mem(unsigned int filter, nodemask_t *nodemask, int max_zone_idx)
>>>  
>>>  		nr = alloc_tag_top_users(tags, ARRAY_SIZE(tags), false);
>>>  		if (nr) {
>>> +			pr_notice("Memory alloction profiling is turned %s\n",
>>
>> There's a typo "alloction".
> 
> Nice catch. Thanks!
> 
>>
>>> +				mem_alloc_profiling_enabled() ? "on" : "off");
>>>  			pr_notice("Memory allocations:\n");
>>
>> But I think the message would be more obvious if it said e.g.:
>>
>> "Memory allocations (profiling is currently [on/off]):"
> 
> I can change it in the next version. I saw Andrew gave approval. In this case, shall 
> I send v3 or create a new patch?
> 

Send a v3 as a change is needed in both patches.

>>
>>>  			for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) {
>>>  				struct codetag *ct = tags[i].ct;
>>
> 
> Thanks
> Pan