From: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 05/46] genirq/resend: Switch to lock guards
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 13:52:52 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b0e222ca-0226-45fc-b348-fd21f691a466@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250313155914.210122456@linutronix.de>
Hi Thomas.
On 3/13/25 21:29, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Convert all lock/unlock pairs to guards and tidy up the code.
>
> No functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> ---
> kernel/irq/resend.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/kernel/irq/resend.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/resend.c
> @@ -30,18 +30,17 @@ static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(irq_resend_lo
> */
> static void resend_irqs(struct tasklet_struct *unused)
> {
> - struct irq_desc *desc;
> -
> - raw_spin_lock_irq(&irq_resend_lock);
> + guard(raw_spinlock_irq)(&irq_resend_lock);
> while (!hlist_empty(&irq_resend_list)) {
> - desc = hlist_entry(irq_resend_list.first, struct irq_desc,
> - resend_node);
> + struct irq_desc *desc;
> +
> + desc = hlist_entry(irq_resend_list.first, struct irq_desc, resend_node);
> hlist_del_init(&desc->resend_node);
> +
> raw_spin_unlock(&irq_resend_lock);
> desc->handle_irq(desc);
> raw_spin_lock(&irq_resend_lock);
> }
> - raw_spin_unlock_irq(&irq_resend_lock);
> }
>
> /* Tasklet to handle resend: */
> @@ -75,19 +74,18 @@ static int irq_sw_resend(struct irq_desc
> }
>
> /* Add to resend_list and activate the softirq: */
> - raw_spin_lock(&irq_resend_lock);
> - if (hlist_unhashed(&desc->resend_node))
> - hlist_add_head(&desc->resend_node, &irq_resend_list);
> - raw_spin_unlock(&irq_resend_lock);
> + scoped_guard (raw_spinlock, &irq_resend_lock) {
Nit: Any reason why it is "scoped_guard ()" instead of "scoped_guard()".
Is there a difference between the two?
I have seen in the current code base both are present, i would be nice
to have one of it no? or guideline on which one to use when?
> + if (hlist_unhashed(&desc->resend_node))
> + hlist_add_head(&desc->resend_node, &irq_resend_list);
> + }
> tasklet_schedule(&resend_tasklet);
> return 0;
> }
>
> void clear_irq_resend(struct irq_desc *desc)
> {
> - raw_spin_lock(&irq_resend_lock);
> + guard(raw_spinlock)(&irq_resend_lock);
> hlist_del_init(&desc->resend_node);
> - raw_spin_unlock(&irq_resend_lock);
> }
>
> void irq_resend_init(struct irq_desc *desc)
> @@ -172,30 +170,24 @@ int check_irq_resend(struct irq_desc *de
> */
> int irq_inject_interrupt(unsigned int irq)
> {
> - struct irq_desc *desc;
> - unsigned long flags;
> - int err;
> + int err = -EINVAL;
>
> /* Try the state injection hardware interface first */
> if (!irq_set_irqchip_state(irq, IRQCHIP_STATE_PENDING, true))
> return 0;
>
> /* That failed, try via the resend mechanism */
> - desc = irq_get_desc_buslock(irq, &flags, 0);
> - if (!desc)
> - return -EINVAL;
> + scoped_irqdesc_get_and_buslock(irq, 0) {
> + struct irq_desc *desc = scoped_irqdesc;
>
> - /*
> - * Only try to inject when the interrupt is:
> - * - not NMI type
> - * - activated
> - */
> - if (irq_is_nmi(desc) || !irqd_is_activated(&desc->irq_data))
> - err = -EINVAL;
> - else
> - err = check_irq_resend(desc, true);
> -
> - irq_put_desc_busunlock(desc, flags);
> + /*
> + * Only try to inject when the interrupt is:
> + * - not NMI type
> + * - activated
> + */
> + if (!irq_is_nmi(desc) && irqd_is_activated(&desc->irq_data))
> + err = check_irq_resend(desc, true);
> + }
> return err;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(irq_inject_interrupt);
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-17 8:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-13 15:59 [patch 00/46] genirq: Cleanups and conversion to lock guards Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-13 15:59 ` [patch 01/46] genirq: Provide conditional " Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-13 15:59 ` [patch 02/46] genirq/irqdesc: Switch to " Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-14 10:57 ` Jiri Slaby
2025-03-13 15:59 ` [patch 03/46] genirq/autoprobe: " Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-13 15:59 ` [patch 04/46] genirq/pm: " Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-13 15:59 ` [patch 05/46] genirq/resend: " Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-17 8:22 ` Shrikanth Hegde [this message]
2025-03-13 15:59 ` [patch 06/46] genirq/proc: " Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-13 15:59 ` [patch 07/46] genirq/spurious: Cleanup code Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-13 15:59 ` [patch 08/46] genirq/spurious: Switch to lock guards Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-13 15:59 ` [patch 09/46] genirq/cpuhotplug: Convert " Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-13 15:59 ` [patch 10/46] genirq/debugfs: " Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-13 16:00 ` [patch 11/46] genirq/chip: Prepare for code reduction Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-13 16:00 ` [patch 12/46] genirq/chip: Rework handle_nested_irq() Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-13 16:00 ` [patch 13/46] genirq/chip: Rework handle_simple_irq() Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-13 16:00 ` [patch 14/46] genirq/chip: Rework handle_untracked_irq() Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-13 16:00 ` [patch 15/46] genirq/chip: Rework handle_level_irq() Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-13 16:00 ` [patch 16/46] genirq/chip: Rework handle_eoi_irq() Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-13 16:00 ` [patch 17/46] genirq/chip: Rework handle_edge_irq() Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-13 16:00 ` [patch 18/46] genirq/chip: Rework handle_edge_eoi_irq() Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-13 16:00 ` [patch 19/46] genirq/chip: Rework handle_fasteoi_ack_irq() Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-13 16:00 ` [patch 20/46] genirq/chip: Rework handle_fasteoi_mask_irq() Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-13 16:00 ` [patch 21/46] genirq/chip: Use lock guards where applicable Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-13 16:00 ` [patch 22/46] genirq/chip: Rework irq_set_chip() Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-13 16:00 ` [patch 23/46] genirq/chip: Rework irq_set_irq_type() Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-13 16:00 ` [patch 24/46] genirq/chip: Rework irq_set_handler_data() Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-13 16:00 ` [patch 25/46] genirq/chip: Rework irq_set_msi_desc_off() Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-13 16:00 ` [patch 26/46] genirq/chip: Rework irq_set_chip_data() Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-13 16:00 ` [patch 27/46] genirq/chip: Rework irq_set_handler() variants Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-13 16:00 ` [patch 28/46] genirq/chip: Rework irq_modify_status() Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-13 16:00 ` [patch 29/46] genirq/manage: Cleanup kernel doc comments Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-13 16:00 ` [patch 30/46] genirq/manage: Convert to lock guards Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-13 16:00 ` [patch 31/46] genirq/manage: Rework irq_update_affinity_desc() Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-13 16:00 ` [patch 32/46] genirq/manage: Rework __irq_apply_affinity_hint() Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-13 16:00 ` [patch 33/46] genirq/manage: Rework irq_set_vcpu_affinity() Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-13 16:00 ` [patch 34/46] genirq/manage: Rework __disable_irq_nosync() Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-13 16:00 ` [patch 35/46] genirq/manage: Rework enable_irq() Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-13 16:00 ` [patch 36/46] genirq/manage: Rework irq_set_irq_wake() Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-13 16:00 ` [patch 37/46] genirq/manage: Rework can_request_irq() Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-13 16:00 ` [patch 38/46] genirq/manage: Rework irq_set_parent() Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-13 16:00 ` [patch 39/46] genirq/manage: Rework enable_percpu_irq() Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-13 16:00 ` [patch 40/46] genirq/manage: Rework irq_percpu_is_enabled() Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-13 16:00 ` [patch 41/46] genirq/manage: Rework disable_percpu_irq() Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-13 16:00 ` [patch 42/46] genirq/manage: Rework prepare_percpu_nmi() Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-13 16:00 ` [patch 43/46] genirq/manage: Rework teardown_percpu_nmi() Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-13 16:00 ` [patch 44/46] genirq/manage: Rework irq_get_irqchip_state() Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-13 16:01 ` [patch 45/46] genirq/manage: Rework irq_set_irqchip_state() Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-13 16:01 ` [patch 46/46] genirq: Remove irq_[get|put]_desc*() Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-14 9:04 ` [patch 00/46] genirq: Cleanups and conversion to lock guards Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b0e222ca-0226-45fc-b348-fd21f691a466@linux.ibm.com \
--to=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox