Re: [PATCH] usb: storage: realtek_cr: Simplify rts51x_bulk_transport()

[Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>]

On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 04:43:58PM +0200, Thorsten Blum wrote:
> Change the function parameter 'buf_len' from 'int' to 'unsigned int' and
> only update the local variable 'residue' if needed.
> 
> Update the rts51x_read_status() function signature accordingly.

That last part isn't really necessary, is it?  It doesn't make the code 
any clearer, less buggy, or quicker to execute.

> Signed-off-by: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@linux.dev>
> ---
>  drivers/usb/storage/realtek_cr.c | 9 +++++----
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/storage/realtek_cr.c b/drivers/usb/storage/realtek_cr.c
> index 7dea28c2b8ee..8a4d7c0f2662 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/storage/realtek_cr.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/storage/realtek_cr.c
> @@ -199,7 +199,8 @@ static const struct us_unusual_dev realtek_cr_unusual_dev_list[] = {
>  #undef UNUSUAL_DEV
>  
>  static int rts51x_bulk_transport(struct us_data *us, u8 lun,
> -				 u8 *cmd, int cmd_len, u8 *buf, int buf_len,
> +				 u8 *cmd, int cmd_len, u8 *buf,
> +				 unsigned int buf_len,
>  				 enum dma_data_direction dir, int *act_len)
>  {
>  	struct bulk_cb_wrap *bcb = (struct bulk_cb_wrap *)us->iobuf;
> @@ -260,8 +261,8 @@ static int rts51x_bulk_transport(struct us_data *us, u8 lun,
>  	 * try to compute the actual residue, based on how much data
>  	 * was really transferred and what the device tells us
>  	 */
> -	if (residue)
> -		residue = residue < buf_len ? residue : buf_len;
> +	if (residue > buf_len)
> +		residue = buf_len;

This really has nothing at all to do with whether buf_len is a signed 
quantity -- it should never be negative.  (And I have no idea why the 
original code includes that test for residue being nonzero.)

Much more serious is something you didn't change: Just above these lines 
it says:

	residue = bcs->Residue;

It should say:

	residue = le32_to_cpu(bcs->Residue);

Alan Stern