Re: [PATCH] platform/chrome: cros_ec_lpc: Add DMI definition for post-Skylake machines running custom Coreboot builds

[Alicja Michalska <ahplka19@gmail.com>]

Thank you for your feedback.

I've explained the reason behind adding this patch, but we'll go with 
different approach next time around.

Since we're discussing this, I would like to suggest removal of DMI 
matches for EOL machines from lines 503...535 (Link, Samus, Peppy, Glimmer).

Those machines aren't supported by Google anymore. Patch I suggested 
will match DMI while running custom firmware.

If maintainers are okay with it, I will submit a patch removing DMI 
matches for stock firmware running on those machines since it's not 
needed anymore.

On 21/07/2023 08:39, Tzung-Bi Shih wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 12:37:15AM +0200, Alicja Michalska wrote:
>> ChromeOS EC LPC lacks DMI match for newer machines, which
>> use "Google" DMI_SYS_VENDOR as opposed to "GOOGLE" in older models.
> 
> I'm confused about the sentence as it looks irrelevant to the patch.
> 
>> This patch adds DMI definition for MrChomebox's custom Coreboots builds,
>> which we (Chrultrabook Project) are using.
> 
> s/This patch adds/Add/.  Search "imperative mood" in [1].
> 
> Looks like a typo: s/MrChomebox/MrChromebox/.
> 
> If you get chance to send next version, please shorten the commit title.
> I guess "platform/chrome: cros_ec_lpc: Add DMI match for MrChromebox" should
> be quite explicit.
> 
> [1]: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html
> 
>> +	/* DMI doesn't match modern machines running custom firmware */
> 
> Remove the line.
> 
>> +	{
>> +		/* MrChromebox's firmware */
>> +		.matches = {
>> +			DMI_MATCH(DMI_BIOS_VENDOR, "coreboot"),
>> +			DMI_MATCH(DMI_BIOS_VERSION, "MrChromebox-"),
>> +		},
>> +	},
> 
> Put the block after "A small number of non-Chromebook/box machines also use
> the ChromeOS EC"[2].
> 
> [2]: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.4/source/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_lpc.c#L533