From: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
To: Stepan Ionichev <sozdayvek@gmail.com>, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: jgg@ziepe.ca, jhubbard@nvidia.com, peterx@redhat.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/gup: tolerate NULL unlocked in fixup_user_fault()
Date: Fri, 8 May 2026 10:33:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b1ec6c2a-b198-420c-9ab3-5ffad7f8b92b@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260507083050.416-1-sozdayvek@gmail.com>
On 5/7/26 10:30, Stepan Ionichev wrote:
> fixup_user_fault() takes a "bool *unlocked" output parameter that
> callers may set to NULL when they do not want the retry/unlock
> machinery. The function honours that contract on the way in:
>
> if (unlocked)
> fault_flags |= FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY | FAULT_FLAG_KILLABLE;
>
> so callers passing NULL never set FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY. In return,
> handle_mm_fault() is not expected to produce VM_FAULT_RETRY or
> VM_FAULT_COMPLETED for them, which is why the dereferences of
> unlocked further down used to be considered unreachable.
>
> That invariant is implicit, not enforced. At least one caller in
> arch/s390/pci/pci_mmio.c does pass NULL:
>
> fixup_user_fault(current->mm, mmio_addr, FAULT_FLAG_WRITE, NULL);
>
> If a future change in handle_mm_fault() ever returned
> VM_FAULT_COMPLETED or VM_FAULT_RETRY without ALLOW_RETRY having been
> requested, the unconditional "*unlocked = true" stores would
> NULL-deref and crash the kernel for this path.
That would be completely broken. We must not drop the mmap lock unless
FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY was set. Returning VM_FAULT_COMPLETED/VM_FAULT_RETRY
would mean that we did that. Broken.
And the function documents "If NULL, the caller must guarantee that fault_flags
does not contain FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY."
--
Cheers,
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-08 8:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-07 8:30 [PATCH] mm/gup: tolerate NULL unlocked in fixup_user_fault() Stepan Ionichev
2026-05-08 8:33 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm) [this message]
2026-05-08 11:18 ` Stepan Ionichev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b1ec6c2a-b198-420c-9ab3-5ffad7f8b92b@kernel.org \
--to=david@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=sozdayvek@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox