From: daw@mozart.cs.berkeley.edu (David Wagner)
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BK PATCH] LSM changes for 2.5.59
Date: 6 Feb 2003 17:16:39 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b1u59n$lhl$1@abraham.cs.berkeley.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20030206151820.A11019@infradead.org
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>Well, selinux is still far from a mergeable shape and even needed additional
>patches to the LSM tree last time I checked. This think of submitting hooks
>for code that obviously isn't even intende to be merged in mainline is what
>I really dislike, and it's the root for many problems with LSM.
You keep bringing up SELinux. Maybe you dislike SELinux; I don't know.
In any case, LSM is not there just to support SELinux. It's intended
to support a broad range of security modules and security policies.
LSM is bigger than just SELinux.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-02-06 17:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-06 15:02 [BK PATCH] LSM changes for 2.5.59 Stephen D. Smalley
2003-02-06 15:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-02-06 17:16 ` David Wagner [this message]
2003-02-06 17:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-02-06 17:51 ` Alan Cox
2003-02-08 2:20 ` jmjones
2003-02-08 4:13 ` Miles Bader
2003-02-09 20:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-02-10 1:39 ` Crispin Cowan
2003-02-10 3:02 ` LA Walsh
2003-02-10 3:40 ` Crispin Cowan
2003-02-10 7:34 ` LA Walsh
2003-02-10 8:11 ` Chris Wright
2003-02-10 8:21 ` 'Christoph Hellwig'
2003-02-10 8:33 ` Crispin Cowan
2003-02-10 8:39 ` 'Christoph Hellwig'
2003-02-10 13:31 ` Alan Cox
2003-02-10 17:29 ` Casey Schaufler
2003-02-12 8:12 ` side issues of baloney with that ham...(was LSM changes for 2.5.59) LA Walsh
2003-02-10 20:51 ` [BK PATCH] LSM changes for 2.5.59 LA Walsh
2003-02-10 21:36 ` David Wagner
2003-02-10 22:14 ` Bill Davidsen
2003-02-11 1:35 ` Dave Jones
2003-02-11 13:59 ` the modules problems Roman Zippel
2003-02-11 19:44 ` [BK PATCH] LSM changes for 2.5.59 Bill Davidsen
2003-02-10 4:06 ` J Sloan
2003-02-10 5:59 ` David Wagner
2003-02-10 7:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-02-13 4:08 Mika Kukkonen
2003-02-12 16:58 Makan Pourzandi (LMC)
2003-02-12 18:45 ` 'Christoph Hellwig'
2003-02-12 19:11 ` magniett
2003-02-12 18:38 ` 'Christoph Hellwig'
2003-02-12 22:22 ` Crispin Cowan
2003-02-12 15:37 Pete Loscocco
[not found] <b28k4f$hp4$1@abraham.cs.berkeley.edu>
2003-02-12 8:27 ` LA Walsh
2003-02-10 19:57 Stephen D. Smalley
2003-02-10 22:38 ` LA Walsh
2003-02-10 16:55 Stephen D. Smalley
2003-02-11 8:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-02-13 11:08 ` Chris Wright
2003-02-05 16:59 Stephen D. Smalley
2003-02-05 16:47 Stephen D. Smalley
2003-02-05 16:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-02-05 22:07 ` Greg KH
2003-02-05 22:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-02-05 22:39 ` Russell Coker
2003-02-05 22:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-02-05 15:00 Stephen D. Smalley
2003-02-05 15:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-02-05 16:26 ` Mark Hahn
2003-02-05 13:45 Stephen D. Smalley
2003-02-05 14:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-02-05 4:15 Greg KH
2003-02-05 8:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='b1u59n$lhl$1@abraham.cs.berkeley.edu' \
--to=daw@mozart.cs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox