linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>,
	Trond Myklebust <trondmy@kernel.org>,
	Anna Schumaker <anna@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Laurence Oberman	 <loberman@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] NFS: Fixup allocation flags for nfsiod's __GFP_NORETRY
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2025 15:32:47 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b2743a19cf1db829c8702a4eeadef0f6cc09d2c0.camel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9148ead966dbd7768d6dd832b61a8f1d93f43669.1752072235.git.bcodding@redhat.com>

On Wed, 2025-07-09 at 10:48 -0400, Benjamin Coddington wrote:
> If the NFS client is doing writeback from a workqueue context, avoid using
> __GFP_NORETRY for allocations if the task has set PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO or
> PF_MEMALLOC_NOFS.  The combination of these flags makes memory allocation
> failures much more likely.
> 
> We've seen those allocation failures show up when the loopback driver is
> doing writeback from a workqueue to a file on NFS, where memory allocation
> failure results in errors or corruption within the loopback device's
> filesystem.
> 
> Suggested-by: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@kernel.org>
> Fixes: 0bae835b63c5 ("NFS: Avoid writeback threads getting stuck in mempool_alloc()")
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Laurence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com>
> Tested-by: Laurence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com>
> ---
> 
> 	On V2: add missing 'Fixes' and Laurence's R-b T-b
> 
>  fs/nfs/internal.h | 9 ++++++---
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/internal.h b/fs/nfs/internal.h
> index 69c2c10ee658..7f3213607431 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/internal.h
> +++ b/fs/nfs/internal.h
> @@ -671,9 +671,12 @@ nfs_write_match_verf(const struct nfs_writeverf *verf,
>  
>  static inline gfp_t nfs_io_gfp_mask(void)
>  {
> -	if (current->flags & PF_WQ_WORKER)
> -		return GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NORETRY | __GFP_NOWARN;
> -	return GFP_KERNEL;
> +	gfp_t ret = current_gfp_context(GFP_KERNEL);
> +
> +	/* For workers __GFP_NORETRY only with __GFP_IO or __GFP_FS */
> +	if ((current->flags & PF_WQ_WORKER) && ret == GFP_KERNEL)
> +		return ret |= __GFP_NORETRY | __GFP_NOWARN;
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  
>  /*

This way works too!

Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>

      reply	other threads:[~2025-07-09 19:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-09 14:48 [PATCH v2] NFS: Fixup allocation flags for nfsiod's __GFP_NORETRY Benjamin Coddington
2025-07-09 19:32 ` Jeff Layton [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b2743a19cf1db829c8702a4eeadef0f6cc09d2c0.camel@kernel.org \
    --to=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=anna@kernel.org \
    --cc=bcodding@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=loberman@redhat.com \
    --cc=trondmy@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).