From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch (vps0.lunn.ch [156.67.10.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBD7623748; Mon, 13 May 2024 17:17:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=156.67.10.101 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715620667; cv=none; b=iQNnw/VwkSpdzyqhqyAS2QQ0UBw1lpwyeMJ3K7uzZbPBxeaWxUvcSQ07CYdJioIreSwnr5OsT7TU/oQH8CvntuAdsJCIA19g5jCX0clNU6p4WEDnXYh0QzH1oN94qGj4vJJgTWg+3l5QS4QR+KIFc+VjQfHOeHcgwE8l69bghxE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715620667; c=relaxed/simple; bh=xXJ2xfsVZr5m0SDYHs8VXPitjHPTAc8dVXhYkI6O4pg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=eQHQEPK4FmeJho2J8uwUKVWguWEzRU4ftLN8EALpP9gsm/744iDpXufYSlDilWNjpNFXXeSwNFvmzlwPJs24dk1bE6HrM74sRD9Wlqs0lfMNYO3J2gvdaUZUX7tbXgKnVAtD7pEkNP7PlvVQsIHMRqBPIHgwTffiuLRk6ls0qNg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lunn.ch; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lunn.ch; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b=trH6o5dc; arc=none smtp.client-ip=156.67.10.101 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lunn.ch Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lunn.ch Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b="trH6o5dc" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lunn.ch; s=20171124; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Disposition:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject: Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:References; bh=kat9PfXQHTpWcmnzIUnLFRT8Ol171C09OwLL2tg1hrw=; b=trH6o5dcxGkLEy9v84ytt6FOIY kpCeijP2gdbDv0W3Bvhdj1zpaKTrLZ4rgImC8Rz2Ao8HVsxX4k73KQbJ7Hn0a011q7D1L3t44JQXP INwRLsIUmHJUoUQ1Wi+PAND3K4/ySulbQrgDoPErM9Ncy9cFnfpDzru4GoX9S8/Uqys4=; Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1s6ZIy-00FKAr-I1; Mon, 13 May 2024 19:17:40 +0200 Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 19:17:40 +0200 From: Andrew Lunn To: Bagas Sanjaya Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Regressions , Linux Networking , intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, Jesse Brandeburg , Tony Nguyen , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , lukas.probsthain@googlemail.com Subject: Re: Regression of e1000e (I219-LM) from 6.1.90 to 6.6.30 Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 03:42:50PM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote: > Hi, > > reported on Bugzilla > (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218826) regression on his Thinkpad > T480 with Intel I219-LM: > > > After updating from kernel version 6.1.90 to 6.6.30, the e1000e driver exhibits a regression on a Lenovo Thinkpad T480 with an Intel I219-LM Ethernet controller. Could you try a git bisect between these two kernel versions? You might be able to limit it to drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e, which only had around 15 patches. Andrew