public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: torvalds@transmeta.com (Linus Torvalds)
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bug 350] New: i386 context switch very slow compared to 2.4 due to wrmsr (performance)
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 05:54:37 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b2cnit$7e6$1@penguin.transmeta.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20030212041848.GA9273@bjl1.jlokier.co.uk

In article <20030212041848.GA9273@bjl1.jlokier.co.uk>,
Jamie Lokier  <jamie@shareable.org> wrote:
>
>A cute and wonderful hack is to use the 6 words in the TSS prior to
>&tss->es as the trampoline. Now that __switch_to is done in software,
>those words are not used for anything else.

No!! 

That's not cute and wonderful, that's _horrible_.

Mixing data and code on the same page is very very slow on a P4 (well, I
think it's "same half-page", but the point is that you should not EVER
mix data and code - it ends up being slow on modern CPU's).

>Other fixed offsets from &tss->esp0 are possible - especially nice
>would be to share a cache line with the GDT's hot cache line.  (To do
>this, place GDT before TSS, make KERNEL_CS near the end of the GDT,
>and then the accesses to GDT, trampoline and tss->esp0 will all touch
>the same cache line if you're lucky).

Since almost all x86 CPU's have some kind of cacheline exclusion policy
between the I$ and the D$ (to handle the strict x86 I$ coherency
requirements), your "if you're lucky" is completely bogus.  In fact,
you'd be the _pessimal_ cache behaviour for something like that, ie you
get lines that ping-pong between the L2 and the two instruction caches. 

Don't do it. Keep data and code on separate pages.

			Linus

  reply	other threads:[~2003-02-12  5:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-02-12  1:35 [Bug 350] New: i386 context switch very slow compared to 2.4 due to wrmsr (performance) Martin J. Bligh
2003-02-12  2:59 ` Dave Jones
2003-02-12  4:21   ` Jamie Lokier
2003-02-12  5:49     ` Linus Torvalds
2003-02-12 10:12       ` Jamie Lokier
2003-03-10  3:07         ` Linus Torvalds
2003-03-10 11:06           ` Andi Kleen
2003-03-10 18:33             ` Linus Torvalds
2003-03-10 22:44           ` Linus Torvalds
2003-02-12 12:54     ` Dave Jones
2003-02-12  7:50   ` Andi Kleen
2003-02-12 10:27     ` Jamie Lokier
2003-02-12 10:45       ` Andi Kleen
2003-02-12 17:52         ` Ingo Oeser
2003-02-12 18:13           ` Dave Jones
2003-02-12 18:18           ` Andi Kleen
2003-02-13  2:42             ` Alan Cox
2003-02-13  5:17         ` Eric W. Biederman
2003-02-13 18:07           ` Andi Kleen
2003-02-14  0:14             ` [discuss] " Peter Tattam
2003-02-14  1:29               ` Andi Kleen
2003-02-14  1:51               ` Eric Northup
2003-02-14  2:01                 ` Peter Tattam
2003-02-14  4:07                   ` Thomas J. Merritt
2003-02-14  9:38                     ` Peter Finderup Lund
2003-02-14  8:27               ` Eric W. Biederman
2003-03-19  1:22             ` Rob Landley
2003-02-12  4:18 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-02-12  5:54   ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2003-02-12 10:18     ` Jamie Lokier
2003-02-12 17:24       ` Linus Torvalds
2003-03-18 15:24     ` Kevin Pedretti
2003-03-18 16:41       ` Linus Torvalds
2003-03-18 18:30         ` Brian Gerst
2003-03-18 19:14           ` Thomas Molina
2003-03-18 19:21           ` Linus Torvalds
2003-03-18 20:03             ` Thomas Schlichter
2003-03-18 20:24             ` Steven Cole
2003-03-19  0:42             ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-03-19  2:22               ` george anzinger
     [not found] <20030318165013$55f4@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found] ` <20030318184010$6448@gated-at.bofh.it>
2003-03-18 20:19   ` Pascal Schmidt
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-03-19  9:55 Ph. Marek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='b2cnit$7e6$1@penguin.transmeta.com' \
    --to=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox