From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 764911553A2; Wed, 28 Aug 2024 18:39:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1724870342; cv=none; b=hPv2WtP/c1D/mG46I6f186h3BSsyT6diG9wfeXrmTaVic0sv5xvONyPmxws1lvYWUWrB4rvHanZo2glDibmBOvhhchFjgcSzIrBsEPD2URLldL/JOjZenC7V+V3pCTnc17zeIhmdeoO66XouyWVb7xKOfKSgCJkfYU0nbskmarI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1724870342; c=relaxed/simple; bh=x7SdE42KbvXOA6sb0fTZsjwo8QK2NhUXyigglHvanCI=; h=Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:References: Subject:From:Cc:To:Date; b=UFG4s/jDogcg/hPH+aRW6QrnwdNMTCra9d/5og/YUYzFz9OKZPjb/P9v9amQz1EfiAyr2STpyvluINTKrW7DTY/gx4CribepCxxpijrLDaVjNwfVPEtWAQGVF4DkzBCwikFQ+lNCksc5xEEjzrSIC9lxZbUsabftAteYwwMuoow= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=FrW3jhbH; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="FrW3jhbH" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E101FC4CEC0; Wed, 28 Aug 2024 18:39:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1724870342; bh=x7SdE42KbvXOA6sb0fTZsjwo8QK2NhUXyigglHvanCI=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Cc:To:Date:From; b=FrW3jhbHUQCUAUiRzCgAzlxjlUBj+MVKlL0O0jPkC45vsQeqC9l0SiJcua4GS+War SYGxKqrkzUGaNDGYeS8FZL6Xt8EIMOKevkcU/plyP6H6ygJOYMgYx2HO5UGoq5rdLF FRQeKHcUDmSaYWK690IMPiMXT3b9cnAqbIa/XywXaTQL/tGjYzI3U0Qqwm+E5SS3iy kNZtdTE5WQ2w0xlGmohrhcXSgwvHVJfOcgIylTFOC2eW+qGSibpMdEigvDwR8+upNz hc0zzCgKqp2dTn9XNwSqNvcxcKLH8G98Sy9gV+k1d+Ygmb7Erh0RoroZ/23MzM+mm9 E4qntQhj0QQDg== Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: References: <20240822161452.1780149-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20240822161452.1780149-2-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <3e782ac88cc28fb5fa7ed71e7573e60f.sboyd@kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] clk: x86: lpss-atom: Use predefined constants from units.h From: Stephen Boyd Cc: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Michael Turquette To: Andy Shevchenko Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 11:38:59 -0700 User-Agent: alot/0.10 Quoting Andy Shevchenko (2024-08-28 06:11:55) > On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 05:21:00PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > Quoting Andy Shevchenko (2024-08-22 09:14:07) >=20 > ... >=20 > > > static int lpss_atom_clk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > > { > > > struct lpss_clk_data *drvdata; > > > struct clk *clk; > > > + u32 rate; > >=20 > > Do we need a local variable? >=20 > Hmm... The idea was to allow retrieving this via device properties, that'= s why > a separate variable, but that patch wasn't included here. >=20 > Nevertheless, despite above the separate variable makes code a bit better= to > read as we can see what is this value about. >=20 > > > drvdata =3D devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*drvdata), GFP_KE= RNEL); > > > if (!drvdata) > > > return -ENOMEM; > > > =20 > > > + /* Default frequency is 100MHz */ > > > + rate =3D 100 * HZ_PER_MHZ; > > > + > > > /* LPSS free running clock */ > > > drvdata->name =3D "lpss_clk"; > > > - clk =3D clk_register_fixed_rate(&pdev->dev, drvdata->name, NU= LL, > > > - 0, 100000000); > > > + clk =3D clk_register_fixed_rate(&pdev->dev, drvdata->name, NU= LL, 0, rate); > >=20 > > This should be a one line patch. >=20 > I don't get this. You mean the entire thingy? Yes. >=20 > It's possible, but as I mentioned above there is a rationale for making i= t with > a temporary variable. The rationale looks like future code will want a local variable. When that happens the local variable would make sense.