From: Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@bootlin.com>
To: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Chen <Peter.Chen@nxp.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: chipidea: Grab the (legacy) USB PHY by phandle first
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 15:22:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b42e37ab06ae3efa244a35df801e2126fd692bb7.camel@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190116144429.7df1d0c5@windsurf>
Hi,
On Wed, 2019-01-16 at 14:44 +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Well prior to your code, there was already a possibility for both
> ci->phy and ci->usb_phy to be valid. I don't think it's really useful
> to avoid the fallback when a generic PHY has already been found, it's
> confusing. If really you want to clarify that, it should be:
>
> /* Let's first try to find a generic PHY */
> ci->phy = devm_phy_get(dev->parent, "usb-phy");
> if (IS_ERR(ci->phy)) {
> /* Fall back to legacy USB PHY */
> ci->usb_phy = devm_usb_get_phy_by_phandle(dev->parent, "phys", 0);
> if (IS_ERR(ci->usb_phy))
> ci->usb_phy = devm_usb_get_phy(dev->parent, USB_PHY_TYPE_USB2);
> }
>
> With that, you would only have either ci->phy or ci->usb_phy be valid,
> and never both. With your change, you can have ci->phy and ci->usb_phy
> both be valid if the legacy USB PHY was found using
> devm_usb_get_phy_by_phandle(), but not if we fell back to
> devm_usb_get_phy().
Okay that makes sense, your suggestion is indeed more consistent with
the existing behavior. I'll go with that in the next revision!
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Kocialkowski, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-16 14:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-16 10:10 [PATCH] usb: chipidea: Grab the (legacy) USB PHY by phandle first Paul Kocialkowski
2019-01-16 10:53 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2019-01-16 13:30 ` Paul Kocialkowski
2019-01-16 13:44 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2019-01-16 14:22 ` Paul Kocialkowski [this message]
2019-01-17 6:44 ` Peter Chen
2019-01-17 16:38 ` Paul Kocialkowski
2019-01-18 2:18 ` Peter Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b42e37ab06ae3efa244a35df801e2126fd692bb7.camel@bootlin.com \
--to=paul.kocialkowski@bootlin.com \
--cc=Peter.Chen@nxp.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox