public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
To: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Zefan Li <lizefan.x@bytedance.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cgroup/cpuset: Adjust exception handling in generate_sched_domains()
Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2024 09:56:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b441f304-a3cc-4ebe-91cb-84caf55cbfe2@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9cd1ce1d-15c7-427c-9929-f3c75b97b49c@redhat.com>

>> Two resource allocation failures triggered further actions
>> over the label “done” so far.
>>
>> * Jump to the statement “ndoms = 1;” in three cases directly
>>    by using the label “set_ndoms” instead.
>>
>> * Delete an assignment for the variable “ndoms” in one if branch.
>> ---
>>   kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 8 ++++----
>>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>> @@ -973,10 +973,9 @@ static int generate_sched_domains(cpumask_var_t **domains,
>>
>>       /* Special case for the 99% of systems with one, full, sched domain */
>>       if (root_load_balance && !top_cpuset.nr_subparts) {
>> -        ndoms = 1;
>>           doms = alloc_sched_domains(ndoms);
>>           if (!doms)
>> -            goto done;
>> +            goto set_ndoms;
>>
>>           dattr = kmalloc(sizeof(struct sched_domain_attr), GFP_KERNEL);
>>           if (dattr) {
>> @@ -1123,6 +1122,7 @@ static int generate_sched_domains(cpumask_var_t **domains,
>>        * See comments in partition_sched_domains().
>>        */
>>       if (doms == NULL)
>> +set_ndoms:
>>           ndoms = 1;
>>
>>       *domains    = doms;
> Please clarify what this patch is for. Is it just a cleanup with no functional changes or is there a bug that is being fixed?

The development opinions might vary for the presented transformation.
I suggest to reconsider the number of relevant variable assignments here.
Would you categorise an extra statement still as a desirable implementation detail?

Regards,
Markus

  reply	other threads:[~2024-01-01  8:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-31  7:28 [PATCH] cgroup/cpuset: Adjust exception handling in generate_sched_domains() Markus Elfring
2023-12-31 18:29 ` Waiman Long
2024-01-01  8:56   ` Markus Elfring [this message]
2024-01-01 16:26     ` Waiman Long
2024-01-10 15:01 ` kernel test robot
2024-01-10 15:21 ` Waiman Long

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b441f304-a3cc-4ebe-91cb-84caf55cbfe2@web.de \
    --to=markus.elfring@web.de \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizefan.x@bytedance.com \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox