From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Roman Penyaev <roman.penyaev@profitbricks.com>,
Mikhail Sennikovskii <mikhail.sennikovskii@profitbricks.com>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@kernel.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC] KVM: SVM: do not drop VMCB CPL to 0 if SS is not present
Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 17:13:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b4f1b0c0-0db7-e399-b28b-d7f0ceada2d8@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJrWOzD6Xq==b-zYCDdFLgSRMPM-NkNuTSDFEtX=7MreT45i7Q@mail.gmail.com>
On 19/05/2017 18:14, Roman Penyaev wrote:
>
> 1. Simple one, KVM SVM side, which makes sure that CPL is not updated
> if segment is unusable:
>
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> @@ -1549,7 +1549,7 @@ static void svm_set_segment(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> * forces SS.DPL to 3 on sysret, so we ignore that case; fixing it
> * would entail passing the CPL to userspace and back.
> */
> - if (seg == VCPU_SREG_SS)
> + if (seg == VCPU_SREG_SS && !var->unusable)
> svm->vmcb->save.cpl = (s->attrib >>
> SVM_SELECTOR_DPL_SHIFT) & 3;
Based on the discussion between you and Andy, my understanding is that
it would not be enough to ensure that the attributes are preserved
across a roundtrip through KVM_GET_SEGMENT and KVM_SET_SEGMENT. We need
a workaround in the hypervisor if we don't want to pass the CPL to
userspace and back.
Maybe if 1) in 64-bit mode 2) SS.P=0 3) SS selector != 0, then the CPL
can be taken from SS.RPL?
Thanks,
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-30 15:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-19 16:14 [RFC] KVM: SVM: do not drop VMCB CPL to 0 if SS is not present Roman Penyaev
2017-05-21 3:31 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-05-21 7:53 ` Roman Penyaev
2017-05-21 20:19 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-05-24 19:19 ` Roman Penyaev
2017-05-30 14:47 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-05-30 17:35 ` Roman Penyaev
2017-05-30 21:09 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-05-31 10:17 ` Roman Penyaev
2017-05-31 10:50 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-05-30 15:13 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2017-05-30 15:58 ` Roman Penyaev
2017-05-30 16:05 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-05-30 16:31 ` Gi-Oh Kim
2017-06-15 21:44 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-06-16 8:44 ` Roman Penyaev
2017-06-16 16:40 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b4f1b0c0-0db7-e399-b28b-d7f0ceada2d8@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=gleb@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mikhail.sennikovskii@profitbricks.com \
--cc=roman.penyaev@profitbricks.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox