From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irqdomain: remove debugfs_file from struct irq_domain
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 08:47:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b5739c15db3d009556abcf9704984dab@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YC4nhoc9F59/1drh@kroah.com>
On 2021-02-18 08:38, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 09:27:09AM +0100, Michael Walle wrote:
>> Am 2021-02-18 08:31, schrieb Greg KH:
>> > On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 09:50:38PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> > > On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 20:10:50 +0000,
>> > > Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > Am 2021-02-17 21:02, schrieb Marc Zyngier:
>> > > > > On 2021-02-17 19:57, Michael Walle wrote:
>> > > > >> Hi Greg,
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >>> There's no need to keep around a dentry pointer to a simple file that
>> > > > >>> debugfs itself can look up when we need to remove it from the system.
>> > > > >>> So simplify the code by deleting the variable and cleaning up the
>> > > > >>> logic
>> > > > >>> around the debugfs file.
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> This will generate the following oops on my board (arm64,
>> > > > >> freescale/fsl-ls1028a-kontron-sl28-var3-ads2.dts). In debugfs_lookup()
>> > > > >> debugfs_mount is NULL.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > That's odd. I gave it a go yesterday, and nothing blew up.
>> > > > > Which makes me wonder whether I had the debug stuff enabled
>> > > > > the first place...
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I've dropped the patch from -next for now until I figure it out
>> > > > > (probably tomorrow).
>> > > >
>> > > > Mh, maybe its my .config, I've attached it. I also noticed that
>> > > > the board boots just fine in our kernel-ci [1].
>> > >
>> > > I reproduced here. I had disabled GENERIC_IRQ_DEBUGFS for obscure
>> > > reasons, and it caught fire as I re-enabled it.
>> > >
>> > > Adding this fixes it for me:
>> > >
>> > > diff --git a/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c b/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
>> > > index 367ff1c35f75..d8a14cf1a7b6 100644
>> > > --- a/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
>> > > +++ b/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
>> > > @@ -1904,7 +1904,8 @@ static void debugfs_add_domain_dir(struct
>> > > irq_domain *d)
>> > >
>> > > static void debugfs_remove_domain_dir(struct irq_domain *d)
>> > > {
>> > > - debugfs_remove(debugfs_lookup(d->name, domain_dir));
>> > > + if (domain_dir)
>> > > + debugfs_remove(debugfs_lookup(d->name, domain_dir));
>> > > }
>> > >
>> > > void __init irq_domain_debugfs_init(struct dentry *root)
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Could you please check whether it works for you?
>> >
>> > Can you try this debugfs core change instead? Callers to debugfs should
>> > not have to do the above type of checking as debugfs should be much more
>> > robust than that.
>> >
>> > thanks,
>> >
>> > greg k-h
>> >
>> >
>> > diff --git a/fs/debugfs/inode.c b/fs/debugfs/inode.c
>> > index 2fcf66473436..5aa798f52b6e 100644
>> > --- a/fs/debugfs/inode.c
>> > +++ b/fs/debugfs/inode.c
>> > @@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ struct dentry *debugfs_lookup(const char *name,
>> > struct dentry *parent)
>> > {
>> > struct dentry *dentry;
>> >
>> > - if (IS_ERR(parent))
>> > + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(name) || IS_ERR(parent))
>> > return NULL;
>> >
>> > if (!parent)
>>
>> This doesn't work. name is not NULL when it is called.
>
> Ok, but it is a good check we need to make anyway, I'll add it to a
> patch series :)
>
>> What has to happen before debugfs_lookup() can be called? Looks like
>> someone has to initialize the static debugfs_mount, first.
>
> Wow, wait, you are removing a debugfs file _before_ debugfs is even
> initialized? Didn't expect that, ok, let me go try this again...
Yeah, that's a poor man's rename (file being deleted and re-created).
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-18 10:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-16 14:36 [PATCH] irqdomain: remove debugfs_file from struct irq_domain Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-02-16 15:36 ` [irqchip: irq/irqchip-next] irqdomain: Remove " irqchip-bot for Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-02-17 19:57 ` [PATCH] irqdomain: remove " Michael Walle
2021-02-17 20:02 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-17 20:10 ` Michael Walle
2021-02-17 21:50 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-17 22:21 ` Michael Walle
2021-02-18 7:16 ` Greg KH
2021-02-18 7:31 ` Greg KH
2021-02-18 8:27 ` Michael Walle
2021-02-18 8:38 ` Greg KH
2021-02-18 8:47 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2021-02-18 8:54 ` Greg KH
2021-02-18 9:04 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-18 9:38 ` Greg KH
2021-02-18 10:39 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-18 8:52 ` Greg KH
2021-02-18 9:04 ` Michael Walle
2021-02-18 9:08 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-18 8:40 ` Greg KH
2021-02-18 8:46 ` Michael Walle
2021-02-18 11:43 ` [irqchip: irq/irqchip-next] irqdomain: Remove " irqchip-bot for Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-03-08 20:25 ` irqchip-bot for Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b5739c15db3d009556abcf9704984dab@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael@walle.cc \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox