From: Tariq Toukan <ttoukan.linux@gmail.com>
To: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
Gal Pressman <gal@nvidia.com>, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 8/9] sched/topology: Introduce for_each_numa_hop_cpu()
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2022 12:46:28 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b5ce51e6-976b-1729-3023-c4c4deb36f14@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220825181210.284283-9-vschneid@redhat.com>
On 8/25/2022 9:12 PM, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> The recently introduced sched_numa_hop_mask() exposes cpumasks of CPUs
> reachable within a given distance budget, but this means each successive
> cpumask is a superset of the previous one.
>
> Code wanting to allocate one item per CPU (e.g. IRQs) at increasing
> distances would thus need to allocate a temporary cpumask to note which
> CPUs have already been visited. This can be prevented by leveraging
> for_each_cpu_andnot() - package all that logic into one ugl^D fancy macro.
>
> Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
> ---
> include/linux/topology.h | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/topology.h b/include/linux/topology.h
> index 13b82b83e547..6c671dc3252c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/topology.h
> +++ b/include/linux/topology.h
> @@ -254,5 +254,42 @@ static inline const struct cpumask *sched_numa_hop_mask(int node, int hops)
> }
> #endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */
>
> +/**
> + * for_each_numa_hop_cpu - iterate over CPUs by increasing NUMA distance,
> + * starting from a given node.
> + * @cpu: the iteration variable.
> + * @node: the NUMA node to start the search from.
> + *
> + * Requires rcu_lock to be held.
> + * Careful: this is a double loop, 'break' won't work as expected.
> + *
> + *
> + * Implementation notes:
> + *
> + * Providing it is valid, the mask returned by
> + * sched_numa_hop_mask(node, hops+1)
> + * is a superset of the one returned by
> + * sched_numa_hop_mask(node, hops)
> + * which may not be that useful for drivers that try to spread things out and
> + * want to visit a CPU not more than once.
> + *
> + * To accommodate for that, we use for_each_cpu_andnot() to iterate over the cpus
> + * of sched_numa_hop_mask(node, hops+1) with the CPUs of
> + * sched_numa_hop_mask(node, hops) removed, IOW we only iterate over CPUs
> + * a given distance away (rather than *up to* a given distance).
> + *
> + * hops=0 forces us to play silly games: we pass cpu_none_mask to
> + * for_each_cpu_andnot(), which turns it into for_each_cpu().
> + */
> +#define for_each_numa_hop_cpu(cpu, node) \
> + for (struct { const struct cpumask *curr, *prev; int hops; } __v = \
> + { sched_numa_hop_mask(node, 0), NULL, 0 }; \
> + !IS_ERR_OR_NULL(__v.curr); \
> + __v.hops++, \
> + __v.prev = __v.curr, \
> + __v.curr = sched_numa_hop_mask(node, __v.hops)) \
> + for_each_cpu_andnot(cpu, \
> + __v.curr, \
> + __v.hops ? __v.prev : cpu_none_mask)
>
Hiding two nested loops together in one for_each_* macro leads to
unexpected behavior for the standard usage of 'break/continue'.
for_each_numa_hop_cpu(cpu, node) {
if (condition)
break; <== will terminate the inner loop only, but it's
invisible to the human developer/reviewer.
}
These bugs will not be easy to spot in code review.
> #endif /* _LINUX_TOPOLOGY_H */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-05 9:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-25 18:12 [PATCH v3 0/9] sched, net: NUMA-aware CPU spreading interface Valentin Schneider
2022-08-25 18:12 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] cpumask: Make cpumask_full() check for nr_cpu_ids bits Valentin Schneider
2022-08-25 20:49 ` Yury Norov
2022-08-28 8:35 ` Sander Vanheule
2022-08-28 16:38 ` Yury Norov
2022-08-25 18:12 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] lib/test_cpumask: Make test_cpumask_last " Valentin Schneider
2022-08-25 18:12 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] bitops: Introduce find_next_andnot_bit() Valentin Schneider
2022-08-25 21:05 ` Yury Norov
2022-08-25 23:17 ` Valentin Schneider
2022-08-25 18:12 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] cpumask: Introduce for_each_cpu_andnot() Valentin Schneider
2022-08-25 21:14 ` Yury Norov
2022-09-05 16:44 ` Valentin Schneider
2022-09-05 18:33 ` Yury Norov
2022-08-25 18:12 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] lib/test_cpumask: Add for_each_cpu_and(not) tests Valentin Schneider
2022-08-25 18:12 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] sched/core: Merge cpumask_andnot()+for_each_cpu() into for_each_cpu_andnot() Valentin Schneider
2022-08-25 21:16 ` Yury Norov
2022-08-25 23:20 ` Valentin Schneider
2022-08-25 18:12 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] sched/topology: Introduce sched_numa_hop_mask() Valentin Schneider
2022-08-26 8:14 ` Yicong Yang
2022-09-05 16:51 ` Valentin Schneider
2022-08-25 18:12 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] sched/topology: Introduce for_each_numa_hop_cpu() Valentin Schneider
2022-09-05 9:46 ` Tariq Toukan [this message]
2022-09-05 16:44 ` Valentin Schneider
2022-08-25 18:12 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] SHOWCASE: net/mlx5e: Leverage for_each_numa_hop_cpu() Valentin Schneider
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b5ce51e6-976b-1729-3023-c4c4deb36f14@gmail.com \
--to=ttoukan.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gal@nvidia.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox