From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-180.mta1.migadu.com (out-180.mta1.migadu.com [95.215.58.180]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BE4A15250D for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2024 21:14:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.180 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714079643; cv=none; b=ay8scXghwZSwXy59c/XaehBjnbkxULhk82vuOHt5EjPe3mv1GXqC8OvoIV7MphpCdyi3XC1OVHQKLTVWLmfMMj+2gePK6Fbr592uahPnMyhy8q785NF7S/ZyPkdgO3qGuJdbmIDfX4nycvRl3gIPuwf0FSAhuZ7ZTbHotlDjFWI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714079643; c=relaxed/simple; bh=AeG56uVFyyntK5nYKOlngFLCNZ/j6pt77ZKNiGCZxgc=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=Ynk1xiL48zjHEs6RWVkLxe6cqLjUyPIz8thO3CvjdHNPZYtJo2KUtC9+0E5WtILXV/FoJ6j9WGyYL9+rB+cR8HnzjNG+OEipSAARjsL0UiYnAuS6m09MugR4HN1wrYUExTKcl+jLwCdrzpNxzBmNQwFkP1RVRxuXmwye6l68ADM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=kEEX3I+M; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.180 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="kEEX3I+M" Message-ID: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1714079639; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=J76MnMVIJlI0gv+q1JeGEsHaLLINN3L3MN1gfgnkVec=; b=kEEX3I+MfQAQorpZQKFqFgOoyVx5v5JiEspZso99d7xz1SnkdI7qoymNr1/OVt5hZKi6bI w+sRc96P7rI1XkTvAy/AGrQGtyl/mZb4CN64O6JnK+wX34E12JhxF0lbfkt3iXMFErca2/ qyTbpUP7TjNEdfwA5l1aXqEkapKlPAU= Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 05:13:43 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [v1,1/3] drm/panel: ili9341: Correct use of device property APIs To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Neil Armstrong , Randy Dunlap , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jessica Zhang , Sam Ravnborg , Maarten Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard , Thomas Zimmermann , David Airlie , Daniel Vetter References: <20240425142706.2440113-2-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Content-Language: en-US X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Sui Jingfeng In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT Hi, On 2024/4/26 03:12, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 02:53:22AM +0800, Sui Jingfeng wrote: >> On 2024/4/26 02:08, Sui Jingfeng wrote: > Are you speaking to yourself? I'm totally lost. > > Please, if you want to give a constructive feedback, try to understand > the topic from different aspects and then clearly express it. > OK, The previous email analysis the non-DT cases exhaustively, this email intend to demonstrate the more frequently use case. That is, in the *DT('OF')* based systems, device_get_match_data() is completely equivalent to of_device_get_match_data(). So the net results of applying this patch are "no gains and no lost". Things will become clear if we divide the whole problem into two cases(DT and non-DT) to discuss, that's it. That's all I can tell. Sorry about my broken written and sorry for the noise. Thanks for your education in the past. -- Best regards, Sui