From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762809AbZEGS67 (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 May 2009 14:58:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754296AbZEGS5r (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 May 2009 14:57:47 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f176.google.com ([209.85.219.176]:41563 "EHLO mail-ew0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1762211AbZEGS5q convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 May 2009 14:57:46 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=rqe+Y2Im5W2u3430pimHu9Rxr6VhSqMD4H7RAGmkCh4d2prEX/dz9tv80dPjkL77Pm QsZsRX0pJVuOZQ5jW6jawdk7zFKO6MbwvXwl6yGXekzJBbMkf9Cl4js4ruBfen6B2/Y0 avB9WYHfbegWPFF5KGlYNQC0vyFBvBC85XTAw= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <200905072022.15202.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <1241620755-22133-1-git-send-email-nigel@tuxonice.net> <200905071945.45928.rjw@sisk.pl> <200905072022.15202.rjw@sisk.pl> Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 20:57:44 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [TuxOnIce-devel] [RFC] TuxOnIce From: Fabio Comolli To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Matt Price , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nigel Cunningham , Pavel Machek , linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, tuxonice-devel@lists.tuxonice.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 8:22 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thursday 07 May 2009, Matt Price wrote: >> On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> > On Thursday 07 May 2009, U Kuehn wrote: >> >> Pavel Machek wrote: >> >> >> T >> > Also, as you can see from my previous message, I'm not a big fan of fighting >> > over this once again.  Lets try to work together to do something productive >> > instead, shall we? >> > >> >> thank you rafael.  i would really like to see the fighting stop, too. >> Perhaps the best palce to start would be to look directly at the >> patches and, if there are weaknesses, discuss how to improve them? > > Yes, I've talked about that already with Nigel and there's a kind of a plan. > Well, if I may jump in I suggest you start with the full-memory image functionality. This is in my opinion the biggest advantage in tuxonice vs. uswsusp. > Thanks, > Rafael Regards, Fabio > _______________________________________________ > TuxOnIce-devel mailing list > TuxOnIce-devel@lists.tuxonice.net > http://lists.tuxonice.net/mailman/listinfo/tuxonice-devel >