From: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>,
Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86 microcode: work_on_cpu and cleanup of the synchronization logic
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 22:09:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b647ffbd0904211309n2a1295b1jb5d2174fa3e7a5f7@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1240344440.5861.10.camel@earth>
2009/4/21 Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>:
>
> The version below is based on the latest -git.
Sorry, forgot to add a diif-stat.
arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 10 ++-
arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 10 --
arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 223 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 19 ---
4 files changed, 141 insertions(+), 121 deletions(-)
There are about 20 new comment lines.
--
Best regards,
Dmitry Adamushko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-21 20:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-20 20:16 [PATCH] x86 microcode: work_on_cpu and cleanup of the synchronization logic Dmitry Adamushko
2009-04-21 8:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-21 20:07 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2009-04-21 20:09 ` Dmitry Adamushko [this message]
2009-04-22 10:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-22 10:33 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2009-04-22 10:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-22 10:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-22 22:24 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2009-04-23 8:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-23 8:55 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2009-04-23 18:03 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-04-23 22:16 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2009-04-24 12:23 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-04-24 14:11 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2009-04-24 15:30 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-04-24 17:01 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2009-04-24 18:00 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-04-25 10:30 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2009-05-06 22:30 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2009-05-07 8:08 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2009-05-11 21:48 ` [PATCH, -tip] x86 microcode: smp_call_function_single() instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of sync. logic Dmitry Adamushko
2009-05-12 8:27 ` [tip:x86/microcode] x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic tip-bot for Dmitry Adamushko
2009-05-12 8:39 ` tip-bot for Dmitry Adamushko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b647ffbd0904211309n2a1295b1jb5d2174fa3e7a5f7@mail.gmail.com \
--to=dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com \
--cc=andreas.herrmann3@amd.com \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peter.oruba@amd.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).