From: "Dennis Cook" <cook@sandgate.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kernelnewbies@nl.linux.org
Subject: Re: Deactivating TCP checksumming
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 14:22:59 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b6fda2$oec$1@main.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20030401122824.GY29167@mea-ext.zmailer.org
Using RH Linux kernel 2.4.18, setting "features" bit NETIF_F_IP_CSUM does
not appear
to keep a valid IP checksum from being computed in packets presented to my
driver
for transmission. So having HW compute outgoing checksum buys nothing.
Checked this
by suppressing HW checksum computation. Packets are still accepted by peer.
Dennis Cook
Sandgate Technologies
"Matti Aarnio" <matti.aarnio@zmailer.org> wrote in message
news:20030401122824.GY29167@mea-ext.zmailer.org...
> On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 12:12:04PM +0000, shesha bhushan wrote:
> > I get that. I can talk with the driver vendor. But to gain the
usefulness
> > of caculation of CSUM in HW we need to disable the software CSUM
> > calculation in TCP layer in the kernel. Am I correct? I am trying to
find
> > that and I ma stuck there. How to disble the software TCP CSUM
calculation?
> > and later I can talk with driver vendor to enable it in hardware. I
wanted
> > help from linux gurus in disabling TCP csum calculation in the kernel.
>
> The kernel code is already smart enough of detect that the outbound
> device will handle the checksum calculations all by itself, and not
> do it in that case.
>
> Testing of dev->features is done in files:
> net/core/dev.c
> net/ipv4/tcp.c
> (depending what protocol is in question.)
> in the latter case, actually in common tcp path with route-cached
> route_caps flags.
>
> I did
> egrep 'NETIF_F_.._CSUM' net/*/*.c
> to find those.
> (and a number of other subset searches finding nothing)
>
> Grep is your friend.
>
> This whole "zero-copy" infastructure was implemented during
> development in 2.3 series.
>
> > Thanking You
> > Shesha
>
> /Matti Aarnio
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-02 20:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-01 12:12 Deactivating TCP checksumming shesha bhushan
2003-04-01 12:28 ` Matti Aarnio
2003-04-02 19:22 ` Dennis Cook [this message]
2003-04-02 20:36 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-04-02 20:47 ` Dennis Cook
2003-04-02 20:58 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-04-03 20:34 ` Dennis Cook
2003-04-03 20:47 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-04-03 20:57 ` Dennis Cook
2003-04-04 14:20 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-04-04 14:08 ` Abhishek Agrawal
2003-04-04 4:41 ` Ion Badulescu
2003-04-02 21:03 ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-04-02 21:22 ` Dennis Cook
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-04-01 9:47 shesha bhushan
2003-04-01 10:58 ` Matti Aarnio
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='b6fda2$oec$1@main.gmane.org' \
--to=cook@sandgate.com \
--cc=kernelnewbies@nl.linux.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox