From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261440AbTDDWxd (for ); Fri, 4 Apr 2003 17:53:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261443AbTDDWxd (for ); Fri, 4 Apr 2003 17:53:33 -0500 Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:13572 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261440AbTDDWxc (for ); Fri, 4 Apr 2003 17:53:32 -0500 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: VGER's filters.. Date: 4 Apr 2003 15:04:52 -0800 Organization: Transmeta Corporation, Santa Clara CA Message-ID: References: <20030404181054.GT29167@mea-ext.zmailer.org> <20030404210530.GV29167@mea-ext.zmailer.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Disclaimer: Not speaking for Transmeta in any way, shape, or form. Copyright: Copyright 2003 H. Peter Anvin - All Rights Reserved Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Followup to: <20030404210530.GV29167@mea-ext.zmailer.org> By author: Matti Aarnio In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > > I suspect in Sendmail it naturally falls out of using a single set > > of canonicalization rules for all syntax. > > Nope, the protocol line parser in original version was simple, > it reused same code for "MAIL FROM:" and "RCPT TO:" as for > "From:" and "To:",... > It's that what I said? -hpa -- at work, in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." Architectures needed: ia64 m68k mips64 ppc ppc64 s390 s390x sh v850 x86-64