From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Cheng-Yang Chou <yphbchou0911@gmail.com>,
sched-ext@lists.linux.dev, David Vernet <void@manifault.com>,
Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>,
Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
Cc: Ching-Chun Huang <jserv@ccns.ncku.edu.tw>,
Chia-Ping Tsai <chia7712@gmail.com>,
Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH sched_ext/for-7.1] tools/sched_ext: Add __COMPAT wrapper for scx_bpf_sub_dispatch()
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2026 10:12:29 -1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b75214fecccfd6256768f87daa7edb29@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260322144433.1649092-1-yphbchou0911@gmail.com>
Hello,
Let's not use the __COMPAT prefix. I'd like to move toward making compat
wrappers transparent so that schedulers don't need code changes for
compatibility as much as reasonably possible.
Instead, declare the kfunc with a ___compat suffix and provide a static
inline wrapper with the original name, like scx_bpf_dsq_insert() does:
bool scx_bpf_sub_dispatch___compat(u64 cgroup_id) __ksym __weak;
static inline bool scx_bpf_sub_dispatch(u64 cgroup_id)
{
if (bpf_ksym_exists(scx_bpf_sub_dispatch___compat))
return scx_bpf_sub_dispatch___compat(cgroup_id);
return false;
}
See tools/sched_ext/include/scx/compat.bpf.h around line 326-342 for the
full pattern.
This way schedulers just call scx_bpf_sub_dispatch() directly and the
compat layer handles everything. The no-op fallback (returning false) is
fine here since without sub-sched support the dispatch path can't do
anything useful anyway.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-22 20:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20260322144433.1649092-1-yphbchou0911@gmail.com>
2026-03-22 20:12 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2026-03-23 12:53 ` [PATCH sched_ext/for-7.1] tools/sched_ext: Add __COMPAT wrapper for scx_bpf_sub_dispatch() Cheng-Yang Chou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b75214fecccfd6256768f87daa7edb29@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=chia7712@gmail.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=jserv@ccns.ncku.edu.tw \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
--cc=yphbchou0911@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox